D3 Player Takes Cheap Shot

[Rich]

Originally Posted by crosscountry55

As an official, this is a F2. I think T caught it late because of the way he reacted. Wish he had seen it more clearly. But the result was proper.

As a non-official.....that’s felony aggravated assault and should be charged as such.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Flagrant technical.

The police should've been called. Just cause it happened during a game doesn't mean he shouldn't have been arrested for battery.

[Freddy]

Longer footage is widely available on the web, which might bring up issues regarding either 1) the difference between NFHS and NCAA-M signaling and subsequent upgrading of the foul to a flagrant (NFHS) or flagrant 2 (NCAA-M), or 2) whether or not the covering official, having turned his head toward the flight of the ball, saw the actual foul or reacted only to the outcome of the foul.
We're grateful he made the call which ultimately led to the correct adjudication. I'm only analyzing mechanically, and not purely critically.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by Freddy

Longer footage is widely available on the web, which might bring up issues regarding either 1) the difference between NFHS and NCAA-M signaling and subsequent upgrading of the foul to a flagrant (NFHS) or flagrant 2 (NCAA-M), and 2) whether or not the covering official, having turned his head toward the flight of the ball, saw the actual foul or reacted only to the outcome of the foul.

We're grateful he made the call which ultimately led to the correct adjudication. I'm only analyzing mechanically, and not purely critically.

The shot wasn't contested. I'd expect the trail to move his eyes towards rebounding action. Good thing he picked up the kid with a brick in his hand and covered the play.

Crew did its job.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by Rich

Flagrant technical.

The police should've been called. Just cause it happened during a game doesn't mean he shouldn't have been arrested for battery.

I actually have this occurring while the ball is live, thus a flagrant personal (NFHS) or F2 personal (NCAA). Not that it “really” matters, but still.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by SC Official

I actually have this occurring while the ball is live, thus a flagrant personal (NFHS) or F2 personal (NCAA). Not that it “really” matters, but still.

It's close. Looks like the ball is 3/4 through the net when the foul occurs. So technically.....

Without replay, I'm likely going T.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

[bucky]

This falls within the realm of fighting. Flagrant 3.

ESPN reported:

http://www.espn.com/mens-college-bas...ay-bars-campus

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by Rich

It's close. Looks like the ball is 3/4 through the net when the foul occurs. So technically.....

Without replay, I'm likely going T.

I get that. I doubt anyone would be too concerned about the personal/technical aspect of this foul as long as it was picked up.

The only difference between F2 personal vs. technical in this situation would be the throw-in spot; since the shooter went out with an injury on a flagrant foul, anyone would be able to shoot the free throws if personal was ruled.

[Rich]

The shooter / victim shot the FT.

Looks like simply a flagrant 2 according to the box score / play by play.

[eyezen]

Clear case of OOO

he was no longer an air born shooter, i got incidental contact, play on

[Rufus]

Originally Posted by eyezen

Clear case of OOO

he was no longer an air born shooter, i got incidental contact, play on

Ok, you win the internet today!

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by Rich

The shooter / victim shot the FT.

Looks like simply a flagrant 2 according to the box score / play by play.

Interesting, I thought it said he went out of the game for concussion protocol.