The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 14, 2018, 05:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,742
Initial LGP established outside. Therefore if he maintains it, the RA isn’t in play. BUT...when the defender moved toward the shooter slightly when repositioning his right foot, he was not maintaining LGP. So at this point the initial establishment of LGP had been re-started...from the RA.

Ultimately the L seemed to determine that the defender did not re-establish LGP outside the RA before the shooter left the floor. That must be why he pointed to the RA. The video shows that this was a CI and it wasn’t really that close. Should have been a PC foul; I had it as a 90/10 charge and that’s being conservative.

This shows just how hard it is to judge the RA and the two involved players at the same time. Would have liked to have seen C come in and offer help here. I wonder if he had an opinion?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 14, 2018, 05:48pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by AremRed View Post
Offensive foul, defender's right foot is initially inside the RA but he moves it forward and obtains LGP before the shooter leaves the floor. Tough play though. Should have reviewed the RA status on the monitor.
That can only be done in the last 2 minutes of regulation or overtime.

John Gaffney is a good official, but he got this play wrong. Maybe the Trail could have helped out if he had been sideline oriented.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 15, 2018, 08:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
It's also very close as to whether the defender had LGP before the shooter was airborne (but I think he did).

Didn't NCAAM used to have some sort of "upward motion" component on this play?

A lot for the lead to process here.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 15, 2018, 09:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Didn't NCAAM used to have some sort of "upward motion" component on this play?
Yeah, that lasted one season before they went back to the current rule.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 15, 2018, 10:49am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
It's also very close as to whether the defender had LGP before the shooter was airborne (but I think he did).

Didn't NCAAM used to have some sort of "upward motion" component on this play?

A lot for the lead to process here.
Yes, and it made it impossible for the Lead to officiate because he was supposed check for the legality of the secondary defender starting with his feet while also determining if the offensive player had begun his upward motion. Total cluster...
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NIT: Illinois at UCF video request Nevadaref Basketball 24 Thu Mar 23, 2017 10:20pm
Georgetown / St Johns video request Adam Basketball 0 Thu Mar 09, 2017 02:12am
Video request Penn St v Illinois-- BigCat Basketball 0 Sun Mar 06, 2016 01:53pm
Request: Wisconsin / Illinois RA play Rich Basketball 0 Mon Feb 22, 2016 03:49pm
Video Request - Penn State - Illinois canuckrefguy Basketball 12 Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:46pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1