![]() |
|
|
|||
Closed look?
While in lead's primary, looks to me he has a closed look at point of contact. Trail likely had best view of shooter slipping by defender and could've come in with secondary cadence, if needed.
Team down by two, I'm thinking to myself "has to be obvious, has to be obvious..." Let play develop. Late is great.
__________________
Trust your partners, but trust yourself more. Training, experience and intuition are your currency. |
|
|||
Let's not impugn the motives of an official based on a questionable call.
|
|
|||
I see two potential issues on this play. First, before he gets to the secondary defender it appears (from the baseline video), that the primary defender puts his knee into the offensive player as he goes by. Should this have been called a block, before the block/charge/ no call issue ever came up.
As for the call. I would likely have gone no call on this play given that the defender does appear to lean a tiny bit sideways at the moment of contact. I certainly don't see enough to indicate that it was a PC foul. I think a case could also be made that when the offensive player left his feet, the defender was still attaining LGP, but again it is so close, at that point of the game, I would be keeping the whistle silent. I don't see a clear cut foul in that situations of the game. Depending on how the game was going earlier, maybe I have something earlier, but I certainly don't see enough on the final play to make a call there. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT - not the final four, but the final one pic | Mark Padgett | Basketball | 2 | Mon Apr 04, 2011 09:00pm |
Semi final/final system of Beijing | Hirvi | Softball | 14 | Fri Jun 20, 2008 08:28am |
Final Final Final List of Most Misunderstood Basketball Rules | BillyMac | Basketball | 1 | Fri Oct 14, 2005 11:23am |
Women's Final Vs. Men's Final | rainmaker | Basketball | 20 | Wed Apr 09, 2003 07:44pm |
the OTHER block/charge in the final | TriggerMN | Basketball | 3 | Wed Apr 09, 2003 01:12am |