The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 06, 2018, 09:25am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,340
Another judge with nothing better to do...

County Supreme Court Judge overturns Section V referee call | WHAM
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 06, 2018, 09:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 16,671
As I see this, and it's hard to tell from the video, the same girl committed a personal foul followed by a technical foul on two separate (nearly consecutive) possessions.

Interesting that most of the comments are supportive of the call -- rare.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 06, 2018, 09:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 33
This is going to start a bad precedent of coaches and schools suing over calls they donít like
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 06, 2018, 10:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 641
For those that don't know, in NY the Supreme Court is the lower court, not the higher court. So this is a decision of a trial judge.

And the article is horrible, as it doesn't explain anything about the basis for the court order or even what the actual order was. I would hazard a guess that the order was a preliminary injunction in which the court did not make a final decision on the merits of the claim, but concluded that the player would be irreparably harmed if she was not allowed to play while the court proceedings progressed. That would have the effect of letting her play, but not of being a final judgment on the merits. It would also mean that the suspension doesn't go away--she would still have to serve the suspension unless she ultimately prevails. But the article doesn't bother with the details as they just want the drama of the court intervening (which I agree is absurd on so many levels. . . ).
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 06, 2018, 10:47am
LRZ LRZ is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SE PA
Posts: 410
Years and years ago, when I was first barred, I clerked for a trial judge--one of the two smartest, most courageous jurists I have ever know--who was assigned a similar case. After hearing from the lawyers, he determined that the matter was not judiciable--i.e., not a matter for the courts to intervene--and denied the preliminary injunction.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 06, 2018, 08:21pm
Advantage/Disadvantage
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 20
2 different girls in the video.

#3 is disqualified for her 4th and 5th foul.

#5 is ejected for what the referee must have seen as a kick.

Here is the link for the full video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDRYJlSCSzc&t=284s
__________________
Make sure everyone is safe and HAS FUN!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 06, 2018, 08:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 504
This is an outrageous decision, even if only a prelim injunction. There's no real irreparable harm here, no reason for the court to assert jurisdiction.

I'm sure this young girl will grow up well-adjusted and able to handle the normal frustrations of life after 18 years with these hyper-helicopter parents.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 06, 2018, 11:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,247
The parents have more dollars than sense. The parents have told this girl that bad behavior is ok. That rules donít matter, that there are consequences to the actions. The one administrator for Red Creek... players have to have due process prior to a suspension? Really I wonder where this guy got his law degree and studied the 5th and 14th Amendment.... but I guess the judge buy into that ridiculous theory too....

Does this judge understand what he has opened up? Of course the Court of Appeals in New York will never let it stand but the layer made his money and the player LOST in the next game.

Yeah right letís allow any call that that someone disagrees with ... look the courts are overcrowded as it is and then add this nonsense. Maybe the New York Judge should just look to a couple of previous cases

Alan Goldberger - Why Courts Should Not Overturn a Referee's Call

I have not researched every case but standard American law is that judges donít intervene and I just donít se how she has any chance to win on the merits... but hey, Iím not licensed in New York...
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 06, 2018, 11:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,247
Maybe this judge should have heeded the words of a Federal Judge in Texas.... this was from a case when an umpire refused to play a game in Houston because of bad field conditions

Fortunately, the legal question is: Is it manifestly arbitrary for a reasonable person to object to the playing conditions as they existed. The answer is that several apparently reasonable people objected, and the one person who had the responsibility for making the decision decided that he objected. An erroneous call of pass interference can cost a team the game and the stadium the opportunity for play-off games. Without evidence of the referee's corruption by lucre or malice, an error is an error.

Of course the Georgia Supreme Court got it right in 1981

...we held that a high school football player has no right to participate in interscholastic sports and has no protectable property interest which would give rise to a due process claim. Pretermitting the question of "state action" which is the threshold of the 14th Amendment, we held that Smith was not denied equal protection by the rule of GHSA there involved. ...We now go further and hold that courts of equity in this state are without authority to review decisions of football referees because those decisions do not present judicial controversies.

Given the case law.... I wonder if this judge had recently been to a state where whacky weed is no legal....?????
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 07, 2018, 12:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 641
From the articles I saw, it was garbled as to whether it was a New York Supreme Court judge (the state trial court), or a lower level judge--I saw both asserted in articles.

While I think there is no chance an appellate court would uphold this nonsense--overturning a judgment call in court!?!?!?--I doubt it will get there. She got to play the playoff game; she lost. The order had all the appearances of a TRO or preliminary injunction. If she drops the matter now, presumably she will serve her suspension in the first game of next year. Is her family likely to continue spending money to make her eligible for that game? I doubt it. So there is nothing to appeal and if hte association tried to appeal it would likely be dismissed as moot. (Unless, I think, the high school association wants to extend the litigation by arguing that the appellate court can hear their moot challenge under the mushy standard of likely to be repeated yet evade review. But is the association going to want to spend money chasing that?)
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 07, 2018, 04:16pm
Stubborn Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,412
I only watched the video once, but I think the official called an intentional foul for dead ball contact (at least he gave the IF signal). Shouldn't it have been a technical?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 07, 2018, 04:30pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 12,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by BryanV21 View Post
I only watched the video once, but I think the official called an intentional foul for dead ball contact (at least he gave the IF signal). Shouldn't it have been a technical?
Officials did a poor of signaling and communicating what they had on both plays.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 07, 2018, 06:43pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond View Post
Officials did a poor of signaling and communicating what they had on both plays.


Understatement. Didn't help them, either.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 07, 2018, 07:29pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 16,024
Plea Bargain ...

__________________
John 3:16 "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 08, 2018, 02:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 641
In another article (https://www.democratandchronicle.co....saa/401340002/), the school superintendent is quoted:
"A disqualifying foul has to be violent, severe or cause injury," Sholes said, "and I didnít see any of those. I could make a case she was protecting herself from the girl falling on her."
What's the actual standard for a dead ball action being a DQ?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Field judge, side judge question JasonLJ Football 7 Thu Sep 25, 2014 09:42am
Being A Back Judge Ed Hickland Football 34 Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:37am
New Back Judge Junker Football 15 Mon Aug 28, 2006 02:50pm
You be the Judge WestMichBlue Softball 9 Sun Jun 29, 2003 09:34am
Back Judge db Football 1 Mon Aug 14, 2000 02:20am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1