Arkansas @ Auburn plays (Video)

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by rockyroad

Play 3: player going oob of his own volition...is that the correct signal? The delayed violation fist?

I was wondering about that too. I don't think I've seen anything that suggest indicating a delayed violation for that situation.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

I was wondering about that too. I don't think I've seen anything that suggest indicating a delayed violation for that situation.

Yep, it is the correct signal.

[sdoebler]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

I was wondering about that too. I don't think I've seen anything that suggest indicating a delayed violation for that situation.

Scirotto blows his whistle for an unusual call - Chicago Tribune

here's another example of that call and mechanic

[jeremy341a]

#1 and #2 are easy Charge calls IMO.

[crosscountry55]

Originally Posted by Raymond

Yep, it is the correct signal.

Originally Posted by sdoebler

Scirotto blows his whistle for an unusual call - Chicago Tribune

here's another example of that call and mechanic

Just to clarify, this is an NCAA thing and not an NFHS thing, correct?

In NFHS, while I do tend to have a patient whistle to see if going marginally OOB for an unauthorized reason results in a distinct advantage, by rule and by manual I think it's supposed to be an immediate violation. I don't believes there's support in NFHS for waiting as long as we're seeing in these videos. Thoughts?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by crosscountry55

Just to clarify, this is an NCAA thing and not an NFHS thing, correct?

In NFHS, while I do tend to have a patient whistle to see if going marginally OOB for an unauthorized reason results in a distinct advantage, by rule and by manual I think it's supposed to be an immediate violation. I don't believes there's support in NFHS for waiting as long as we're seeing in these videos. Thoughts?

NFHS: Immediate violation.

NCAAW: Violation if the first (meaning "next") to touch the ball after returning. No signal as we saw in the NCAAM video.

[HokiePaul]

I wonder what the C was thinking/doing on play 5 -- Lead had to come all the way across the lane to get that obvious foul, while the C just casually stands there as if he sees the whole play but somehow rules that legal.

Anyway, that's what I'd want to know from my partner if I was the L on this play. Am I missing something here with college areas of coverage or something?

[VaTerp]

Originally Posted by sdoebler

I what makes play one difficult is that the defenders arms are not straight up and has them over the offensive play at almost a 45º angle. I think I would go block or no call after it went in.

What does the verticality of his arms have to do whether its a block/charge?

Originally Posted by HokiePaul

I wonder what the C was thinking/doing on play 5 -- Lead had to come all the way across the lane to get that obvious foul, while the C just casually stands there as if he sees the whole play but somehow rules that legal.

Anyway, that's what I'd want to know from my partner if I was the L on this play. Am I missing something here with college areas of coverage or something?

In real time it may have been difficult to see white's illegal contact since he seemed to also get to the ball so quickly.

The L had the only look at the foul that was ultimately called, at least what I think was called, for red grabbing the leg.

[sdoebler]

Originally Posted by VaTerp

What does the verticality of his arms have to do whether its a block/charge?

If the defender has his arms directly over the offensive player and the player jumps up this is illegal contact that occurs before the torso contact for a block/charge.

[HokiePaul]

Originally Posted by VaTerp

The L had the only look at the foul that was ultimately called, at least what I think was called, for red grabbing the leg.

I guess I thought the call was on White for the bear-hug around the neck. I thought that was an easy call for the C to get. You may be right about the leg grab at the end.

[justacoach]

Originally Posted by sdoebler

Scirotto blows his whistle for an unusual call - Chicago Tribune

here's another example of that call and mechanic

What a useless spam-laden website. Furthermore, the link is broken.

[sdoebler]

Originally Posted by justacoach

What a useless spam-laden website. Furthermore, the link is broken.

Link works just fine for me also no spam