Arkansas @ Auburn plays (Video)
 

Play #1:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/h7oWUAZcCH4" frameborder="0" gesture="media" allow="encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Play #2:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6aOxoo1-goE" frameborder="0" gesture="media" allow="encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

A few more plays to come from this game.

Peace

Both plays...LGP obtained, in time. Charge.

I what makes play one difficult is that the defenders arms are not straight up and has them over the offensive play at almost a 45º angle. I think I would go block or no call after it went in.

Easy charge.

Play #3:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/eC_gm5U1sbg" frameborder="0" gesture="media" allow="encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Play #4:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/kSExIpHPcc0" frameborder="0" gesture="media" allow="encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Play #5:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wf828tLHBzo" frameborder="0" gesture="media" allow="encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Peace

3. Great call. He clear went out on his own using two screens in the process to shake the defender.

4. He does travel after finally securing the ball. I be curious to see that play from the other side. I think the C's view got obscured just as the defender stuck his hand in there. I'd be curious to see if there was a missed foul on the left arm causing him to lose the ball.

5. Foul on white for not being a legal necklace....long before red grabbed his leg.

(Edit: renumbered comments to match videos)

Agreed -- well, except maybe for the "legal necklace" part.

Video #1: I can see why the Lead called a Block

Video #4: travels after re-establishing possession

Video #5: foul on White first

Play 3: player going oob of his own volition...is that the correct signal? The delayed violation fist?

I was wondering about that too. I don't think I've seen anything that suggest indicating a delayed violation for that situation.

Yep, it is the correct signal.

Scirotto blows his whistle for an unusual call - Chicago Tribune

here's another example of that call and mechanic

#1 and #2 are easy Charge calls IMO.

The problem I have with this is his arms not being vertical didn't really have anything to do with this call. There was no/minimal contact with his illegal arms, but the offensive player definitely drives his shoulder into the chest of an otherwise legal defender. I think you go PC on this and not think twice.

Play 2 is a good PC.

Just to clarify, this is an NCAA thing and not an NFHS thing, correct?

In NFHS, while I do tend to have a patient whistle to see if going marginally OOB for an unauthorized reason results in a distinct advantage, by rule and by manual I think it's supposed to be an immediate violation. I don't believes there's support in NFHS for waiting as long as we're seeing in these videos. Thoughts?

NFHS: Immediate violation.

NCAAW: Violation if the first (meaning "next") to touch the ball after returning. No signal as we saw in the NCAAM video.