|
Wed Oct 11, 2017, 07:20am
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've had a handful of times when a player barely touched the ball handler, so I didn't even call a foul even though I knew they wanted the foul to stop the clock. Which I believe is what Pantherdreams was getting at.
As for IFs... if I can see some sort of attempt at the ball, and the foul is not "hard", then I'm not going to call it an IF. If I get a call from an assignor later about an IF, I want there to be no doubt it was the right call, not a "yeah, but" thing. 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2016 NCAA Rule Change: OBS - "About to Receive" vs. "In the act of Catching" | teebob21 | Softball | 15 | Wed Mar 02, 2016 10:16pm |
| NHSF "intentional" vs NCAA "flagarent" terminology | Duffman | Basketball | 17 | Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:15pm |
| Is "the patient whistle" and "possession consequence" ruining the game? | fiasco | Basketball | 46 | Fri Dec 02, 2011 08:43am |
| ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight | pizanno | Basketball | 27 | Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am |
Threaded Mode
