Restricted area after/During time-out?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by bucky

Why wouldn't this be an automatic technical foul on the screaming coach? Although no one mentioned it and it wasn't the exact topic, it certainly can feel good to wack a coach...when he is correct. Just because a coach is correct does not give him/her the right to act that way, especially directly in front of the kids.

Automatic??

To each his or her own, but I am not giving a T just because a coach gets emotional. That is kind of what they do and I would be giving Ts all the time if that was the case.

Not many Ts are automatic and certainly not this situation. Not unless you want to not work very much.

Peace

[Rich]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Automatic??

To each his or her own, but I am not giving a T just because a coach gets emotional. That is kind of what they do and I would be giving Ts all the time if that was the case.

Not many Ts are automatic and certainly not this situation. Not unless you want to not work very much.

Peace

I don't let players scream at opposing coaches and I'm not letting coaches scream at opposing players, either. I'm addressing it, for certain.

[bucky]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

a coach gets emotional.

Peace

Must be semantics here. To me, a coach "getting emotional" and a coach going "ballistic screaming at my kid..." are two, very, different things.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Rich

I don't let players scream at opposing coaches and I'm not letting coaches scream at opposing players, either. I'm addressing it, for certain.

Letting someone do something and giving a T are not always the same thing. I do not let players or coaches do a lot of things and I never give a T for it or have to. And I am wondering if this situation was really that dramatic or just a conflict over something silly.

Peace

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Letting someone do something and giving a T are not always the same thing. I do not let players or coaches do a lot of things and I never give a T for it or have to. And I am wondering if this situation was really that dramatic or just a conflict over something silly.

Peace

And "addressing" something doesn't always mean giving a T.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by SC Official

And "addressing" something doesn't always mean giving a T.

That is why I do not have to give many Ts in the first place. I address things and they do not happen again.

Peace

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

That is why I do not have to give many Ts in the first place. I address things and they do not happen again.

Agree. Same thing with me. Don't ignore bad behavior. Always address the issue.

https://youtu.be/GXVgPkUXQYI