The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 13, 2017, 10:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Official View Post
So warn or whack him if he acts the fool. What's so hard about that?

It's 14 less feet we have to police, which should be a positive for all of us.
I see it as 14 MORE feet that we have to police.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 13, 2017, 10:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
I see it as 14 MORE feet that we have to police.
14 less feet for which the location of the coach has to be policed.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 13, 2017, 10:50pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
I see it as 14 MORE feet that we have to police.


Why would you think that?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 15, 2017, 01:05pm
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,775
Making the box bigger is not going to change coach behavior. The coaches who are idiots will still be idiots - the fact that he/she has 14 more feet to roam will just make it easier for everyone in the building to see him/her being an idiot.

The official warning will help a lot of coaches. Sometimes we get wound up because we see things going sideways. An official warning will let those of us who can control ourselves know it is time to exercise that control. And for those of us who are idiots...nothing will change that, so take care of business.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 15, 2017, 02:16pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockyroad View Post
Making the box bigger is not going to change coach behavior. The coaches who are idiots will still be idiots - the fact that he/she has 14 more feet to roam will just make it easier for everyone in the building to see him/her being an idiot.
You are right, I am a little tired of having to worry about if a coach is in the box or not. And at least this gives them more room and being in the box is a lesser issue IMO. I hardly ever work a college game and worry about a coach being out of the box.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 15, 2017, 02:35pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,807
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
You are right, I am a little tired of having to worry about if a coach is in the box or not. And at least this gives them more room and being in the box is a lesser issue IMO. I hardly ever work a college game and worry about a coach being out of the box.

Peace
When they're out of the box in a college game, it's usually, "Holy ****, look at where HE is." Whack.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 15, 2017, 03:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 280
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
When they're out of the box in a college game, it's usually, "Holy ****, look at where HE is." Whack.
And NCAA-M and NCAA-W are recommending extending the coaching box to 38'
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 15, 2017, 04:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,103
There is too much involvement in the game from the coaches. We have gone from captains talking to officials and picking FT shooters to coaches doing that, from no coaching box to 6 feet, to 14 feet, to 28 feet, and from players requesting time-outs to coaches doing it during play.

The rules committee has lost the proper balance and coaches are now over-emphasized. It's unfortunate. The trend is now to give coaches more freedoms and more power, yet less responsibility.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 15, 2017, 04:55pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 23,818
Agree ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
I am a little tired of having to worry about if a coach is in the box or not. And at least this gives them more room and being in the box is a lesser issue ...
Bingo.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NFHS Past Interpretations Archive (2025-26 Added) Nevadaref Basketball 50 Tue Feb 03, 2026 03:29pm
NFHS Past and Present Rules Interps (Rules Changes through 2024) Robert E. Harrison Baseball 14 Fri Mar 15, 2024 04:50pm
Re-entry (NFHS 2017 Softball Rules) wdiveley0514 Softball 5 Wed Apr 05, 2017 07:43am
2017 NFHS Softball Rule Changes Stat-Man Softball 7 Mon Oct 17, 2016 12:51pm
NEW - 2003 NFHS Football Rule Changes (as written by the NFHS Rules Committee) KWH Football 27 Tue Jan 21, 2003 11:30am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1