Women's Final Four
Officials for Stanford-SC are Joe Vaszily, Felicia Grinter, Michol Murray
|
Odd rule set in the women's game,. but go Uconn.
|
UConn/MSU: Lisa Jones, Maj Forsberg, Jesse Dickerson
Wonder who will be working the final. |
Quote:
|
The foul review in the UConn game with 26.6 left in OT is huge.
I don't know NCAAW rules, but in HS, I'd call this a common foul ... one that was just missed in this case. |
Dang they are swallowing the whistles.
|
Quote:
More reasons why I rarely understand women's basketball. Peace |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Players can't fling their arms around without regard for their opponents. This was contact to the head/neck with a forearm. FF1 is a perfectly fine decision after using the monitor. PS If anyone was curious, SC was favored by 2 over Stanford and UConn was favored by 22. |
Does anyone have a link to the flagrant play? Can't find it
|
Quote:
1.) What triggers their ability to review this? A coach or player complaining they were hit in the face on a previous possession? The wild flop to the floor that plants the seed "Oh, we'll have to review that once Miss. St. takes their opportunity to try for goal"? 2.) If their review had led to the conclusion "Not much there; common foul at best," could they STILL award the bonus free throws? What about if the review turned up nothing ... just go to POI? I'm glad UConn didn't end up scoring on the possession that followed the FTs. That would've been a tough pill to swallow for Miss. St. |
While I agree that many people will say there isn't a lot there, however by definition it can be viewed as an F1. IMO, officials on the men' s side have a tendency to pass on an F1 on that play but I think the women's game is more literal therefore resulting in an F1.
Now the whole argument as to time, score, the fact that the play was originally a no call is a whole other debate...... |
Quote:
And I said similarly, not "exactly". Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04am. |