Originally Posted by ODog (Post 1003481)

SC/Fla, 10:00 first half. Is this a travel?

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 1003558)

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/cKpsAJlJYw0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


I am going to disagree with all of you. For one the rule states that the goal is not scored until the ball remains in or passes through the basket. Well the ball does not really go through the basket until 0.3.

There is also no evidence they did not look at this. They have an alternate as well and if there was an issue he can to my knowledge let the crew now. There appeared to be a timeout or some stoppage for some time so I am sure they looked at this. But they did appear to get it right based on the pure rule and we know we must prove that we know the exact rule and apply it to the letter. I am not convinced that 0.4 would have been accurate considering that the ball appears to still be in the net. In other words they would be splitting hairs and IMO making a judgment that would be tight at best. They would get killed if they reviewed this later and Kentucky had made a big basket later. That is an easy decision sitting here at a computer screen or on a couch to make such a decision IMO. But hey, what do I know, just giving an opinion that means nothing in the end right?

Peace

Originally Posted by bucky (Post 1003571)

I am actually surprised at how accurately they stopped the clock at .3. Probably 100 other clock operators would have stopped it at .2 or less.

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 1003524)

UNC v Kentucky
14:30 in the 2nd half.
UNC player at the top of the key.
Did he travel or was the ball knocked out by the defender?

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 1003526)

9:00 exactly left in second half of UNC v Kentucky.
Lead correctly calls goaltending. I was surprised that the call didn't come from the C, but he may have had a whistle too. Hard to see as he was almost out of the frame.

Originally Posted by Fuelrider (Post 1003518)

About 3 seconds left in the first half, the last drive to the bucket by Kentucky.

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 1003546)

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/eCpxus9Da7I" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Peace

Originally Posted by bucky (Post 1003571)

I agree with Jrut. I froze/play/froze play the video and I thought that the ball was touching the net with .6, .5, and .4 seconds. When the ball was no longer in contact with the net, it read .3. I am actually surprised at how accurately they stopped the clock at .3. Probably 100 other clock operators would have stopped it at .2 or less.

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 1003592)

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Bx0f90dOOxM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Peace

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 1003595)

While it was touching the bottom of the net, it was outside of it with the net laying on top of it. That is all that is required. It was entirely through by 0.5.

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 1003596)

Should have been a foul. The defender was way beyond vertical...his hands were even far enough out to actually make contact with the of the shooter's head and made contact with the shooter's arms while in that position.

Originally Posted by OKREF (Post 1003569)

Yes, ends dribble with right foot on floor, picks it up and puts it down before shooting or passing

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 1003596)

Should have been a foul. The defender was way beyond vertical...his hands were even far enough out to actually make contact with the of the shooter's head and made contact with the shooter's arms while in that position.

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 1003590)

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/jRog0jqCMQc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Peace