The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 18, 2017, 01:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Indiana
Posts: 163
Interesting thought...I am pretty sure you could finish with one player but that does pose the question of the team with only one player inbounding the ball if it came to that.

I guess they'd have to throw it pretty high in the air toward half court and hope the individual throwing it in could get it after a muff or tip by the defensive team
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 18, 2017, 01:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 198
Before I started officiating once I retired from coaching, we finished a game with 2 players .. and won
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 18, 2017, 01:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: SLC Utah
Posts: 567
I think a team down to two would realize they better not foul cuz one is going to be hard to play with. And the team with 5 is going to pass the ball and hold it cuz they can easily avoid 2 guys on the floor..haha
__________________
BigT "The rookie"
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 18, 2017, 01:40pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by RefsNCoaches View Post
Interesting thought...I am pretty sure you could finish with one player but that does pose the question of the team with only one player inbounding the ball if it came to that.

I guess they'd have to throw it pretty high in the air toward half court and hope the individual throwing it in could get it after a muff or tip by the defensive team
It would take a very specific situation where a team would be allowed to continue with one player.

The inbounder could throw it off an opponent -- that's about it.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 18, 2017, 01:46pm
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
It would take a very specific situation where a team would be allowed to continue with one player.

The inbounder could throw it off an opponent -- that's about it.
Or not throw it in at all and just take the violation.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 18, 2017, 01:49pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockyroad View Post
Or not throw it in at all and just take the violation.
If the other team doesn't touch the inbound "pass" it's essentially the same thing.

We did a JUCO game with 5 on each team a few weeks ago. All these horrible scenarios crossed my mind, but then nobody fouled out (a player got a 4th with about a minute left).
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 18, 2017, 01:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,010
I worked a game one time where we got down to 2 left on one team(one with 4 fouls) with about 2 minutes left. This team was leading by 6 points at the time. I had this conversation in my mind, and while I don't have my books with me, I recall there being a phrase in there something to the effect of, "if a team gets down to 1 player remaining, it's a forfeit, unless the referee believes they have a reasonable opportunity to win the game." I did remember this at the time, and I was prepared to let the game continue to see if the team with only 2 left was smart enough to run out the clock somehow if they got down to 1 player left.

The team with 2 DID end up winning the game.
__________________
If you ain't first, you're LAST!!!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 18, 2017, 01:55pm
TODO: creative title here
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
It would take a very specific situation where a team would be allowed to continue with one player.

The inbounder could throw it off an opponent -- that's about it.
Here's how I always envisioned it:
Team A (with one player remaining), up by 8-10 points with only a minute or two left in the game.
Team B with 2-3 players remaining, and no timeouts.

Team B shoots, scores. Team A player simply doesn't move to inbound the ball... let the official decide when the throw-in count starts, and whistle the 5-second violation accordingly. Best guess, Team A could run 7-9 seconds off the clock after every made basket by Team B. Assuming Team B takes 2 seconds to score after inbounding, Team A could run off 40ish seconds with 4 possessions, which might be enough to secure the win.

Once Team B takes the lead, of course, the game is over.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 18, 2017, 01:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by jTheUmp View Post
Here's how I always envisioned it:
Team A (with one player remaining), up by 8-10 points with only a minute or two left in the game.
Team B with 2-3 players remaining, and no timeouts.

Team B shoots, scores. Team A player simply doesn't move to inbound the ball... let the official decide when the throw-in count starts, and whistle the 5-second violation accordingly. Best guess, Team A could run 7-9 seconds off the clock after every made basket by Team B. Assuming Team B takes 2 seconds to score after inbounding, Team A could run off 40ish seconds with 4 possessions, which might be enough to secure the win.

Once Team B takes the lead, of course, the game is over.
If the Team A player was smart, they would wait for the official to begin the 5 second count. Then, when the count gets to 4, throw the ball toward the other end of the court with some serious backspin on it, hoping it wouldn't go out of bounds. This would increase the amount of runoff after each basket made by their opponent.
__________________
If you ain't first, you're LAST!!!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 18, 2017, 02:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,010
I found the casebook play with the verbage that discusses this.

3.1.1 SITUATION:

After six players have been disqualified, Team A has only four who are eligible to continue in the game as players. In a gesture of fair play, the coach of Team B indicates a desire to withdraw a player so that each team will have four players on the court.

RULING: This is not permissible. Team B must have five players participating as long as it has that number available. If no substitute is available, a team must continue with fewer than five players. When only one player remains to participate, that team shall forfeit the game unless the referee believes this team still has an opportunity to win the game.
__________________
If you ain't first, you're LAST!!!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 18, 2017, 02:16pm
TODO: creative title here
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whistles & Stripes View Post
I found the casebook play with the verbage that discusses this.

3.1.1 SITUATION:

After six players have been disqualified, Team A has only four who are eligible to continue in the game as players. In a gesture of fair play, the coach of Team B indicates a desire to withdraw a player so that each team will have four players on the court.

RULING: This is not permissible. Team B must have five players participating as long as it has that number available. If no substitute is available, a team must continue with fewer than five players. When only one player remains to participate, that team shall forfeit the game unless the referee believes this team still has an opportunity to win the game.
Ah, yes... I call it the "Hoosiers" ruling...
What the casebook doesn't say, of course, is that there's no requirement for the 5th player to actually have to participate in the game beyond being on the court.
"Coach, you have to have 5 players on the court, but you could just tell one of them to stand in the corner and not do anything"
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 18, 2017, 02:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 537
In addition to the casebook, the rule book has the same note


RULE 3, SECTION 1, ART. 1

Each team consists of five players, one of whom is the captain.

NOTE: A team must begin the game with five players, but if it has no substitutes to replace disqualified or injured players, it must continue with fewer than five. When there is only one player participating for a team, the team shall forfeit the game, unless the referee believes that team has an opportunity to win the game.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No time outs remaining, buy TO with T-foul? NoFussRef Basketball 19 Thu Feb 17, 2011 08:32am
UConn throw-in violation 3 minutes remaining Nevadaref Basketball 9 Sun Mar 29, 2009 01:40pm
1 Player Remaining cford Basketball 21 Mon Nov 15, 2004 04:30am
The on deck batter remaining in the circle until called Porch Dog Baseball 5 Mon Jun 24, 2002 05:12pm
Time Remaining? BktBallRef Football 4 Fri Feb 08, 2002 03:13pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1