Found this Gem 3 seconds

[Sharpshooternes]

https://youtu.be/Fm6L5Gl2eHs

[JRutledge]

So everyone can see without hitting the link.



BTW, this is a horrible call and a total misunderstanding of the rule. Terrible.

Peace

[BryanV21]

I don't really get the technical foul call, either. I guess she was on the court (a bit).

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by BryanV21

I don't really get the technical foul call, either. I guess she was on the court (a bit).

Well without knowing what she/he said, I do not think any of us would know either way. I do not care where there are standing if their comments are over the top. But the call was very poor if 3 seconds was the actual call.

Peace

[BryanV21]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Well without knowing what she/he said, I do not think any of us would know either way. I do not care where there are standing if their comments are over the top. But the call was very poor if 3 seconds was the actual call.

Peace

True. A coach doesn't have to raise their voice to get t'd up.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

... this is a horrible call and a total misunderstanding of the rule.

Originally Posted by JRutledge

... the call was very poor if 3 seconds was the actual call.

The official appears to give the three second violation signal, and also states, loudly, "Three seconds".



What was he thinking? I certainly don't know. Maybe he didn't see the first shot, and thought that the offensive players in the lane lane were passing the ball among themselves? Even if that were true it was still a quick three seconds. Maybe if the last shooter hadn't faked a shot (not moving immediately to try for goal), he wouldn't have called it?

Any way you look at it, I agree with JRutledge, it was a "horrible" call.

Originally Posted by BryanV21

I don't really get the technical foul call, either. I guess she was on the court (a bit).

Looks like he whacked the assistant for standing up and making gestures.

[crosscountry55]

HTBT for the T. Assistants can't stand. If that's where he draws his line, it's defendable. Especially if it's a big deal with the state and/or his assignor.

What preceded it is not so defendable. Montana. Same state that brought us the playoff game buzzer-beater-that-wasn't last year. Hmmm.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Rich]

Looks like he counts to 3 the same way someone I know counts to 5.

[Nevadaref]

Look at the game clock in the video. You can see the seconds on it.
The lay-up is missed at 53. The rebound is grabbed at 52. The next shot is released at 50. The whistle is blown and clock stopped at 49.

The violation call is clearly incorrect.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Look at the game clock in the video. You can see the seconds on it.
The lay-up is missed at 53. The rebound is grabbed at 52. The next shot is released at 50. The whistle is blown and clock stopped at 49.

The violation call is clearly incorrect.

I wouldn't even have started such a count in this scenario. Can anyone here on the forum honestly say they would? A 3-second violation wouldn't even have entered my mind at this point.

[crosscountry55]

Originally Posted by Rich

Looks like he counts to 3 the same way someone I know counts to 5.

Nice!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[crosscountry55]

Originally Posted by Rich

I wouldn't even have started such a count in this scenario. Can anyone here on the forum honestly say they would? A 3-second violation wouldn't even have entered my mind at this point.

Mine neither. The point at which a 3-second violation enters my mind is usually about 3 seconds after I begin to contemplate that perhaps more than 3 seconds have elapsed.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Rich

Looks like he counts to 3 the same way someone I know counts to 5.

Well, you do have to give him some credit...it was in his primary.

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Well, you do have to give him some credit...it was in his primary.

ROFLMTO!!

MTD, Sr.