Found this Gem 3 seconds
 

Embedding is your friend
 

So everyone can see without hitting the link.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Fm6L5Gl2eHs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

BTW, this is a horrible call and a total misunderstanding of the rule. Terrible.

Peace

I don't really get the technical foul call, either. I guess she was on the court (a bit).

Well without knowing what she/he said, I do not think any of us would know either way. I do not care where there are standing if their comments are over the top. But the call was very poor if 3 seconds was the actual call.

Peace

True. A coach doesn't have to raise their voice to get t'd up.

Three Seconds ...
 

The official appears to give the three second violation signal, and also states, loudly, "Three seconds".

https://tse4.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.M...=0&w=163&h=144

What was he thinking? I certainly don't know. Maybe he didn't see the first shot, and thought that the offensive players in the lane lane were passing the ball among themselves? Even if that were true it was still a quick three seconds. Maybe if the last shooter hadn't faked a shot (not moving immediately to try for goal), he wouldn't have called it?

Any way you look at it, I agree with JRutledge, it was a "horrible" call.

Looks like he whacked the assistant for standing up and making gestures.

HTBT for the T. Assistants can't stand. If that's where he draws his line, it's defendable. Especially if it's a big deal with the state and/or his assignor.

What preceded it is not so defendable. Montana. Same state that brought us the playoff game buzzer-beater-that-wasn't last year. Hmmm.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Looks like he counts to 3 the same way someone I know counts to 5.

Look at the game clock in the video. You can see the seconds on it.
The lay-up is missed at 53. The rebound is grabbed at 52. The next shot is released at 50. The whistle is blown and clock stopped at 49.

The violation call is clearly incorrect.

I wouldn't even have started such a count in this scenario. Can anyone here on the forum honestly say they would? A 3-second violation wouldn't even have entered my mind at this point.

Nice! [emoji6]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Mine neither. The point at which a 3-second violation enters my mind is usually about 3 seconds after I begin to contemplate that perhaps more than 3 seconds have elapsed.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well, you do have to give him some credit...it was in his primary. ;)

ROFLMTO!!

MTD, Sr.