![]() |
|
|
|||
Block that was or wasn't
Lets put all nonsense about conspiracy theories and star treatment aside.
Last night at the end of the first half there was foul called on Raptors big man Biyambo trying to block Lebron. I think the call is probably correct especially in real time, but is a great example of the inconsistency of this call in higher level basketball and what takes precendence in regards to determining incidental contact. In some cases we see officials who if the block is clean unless contact after the fact is excessive let this go, other officials who will not allow any contact regardless quality of the blocked shot because the contact is what put them in position to get it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v380rlzNaCI
__________________
Coach: Hey ref I'll make sure you can get out of here right after the game! Me: Thanks, but why the big rush. Coach: Oh I thought you must have a big date . . .we're not the only ones your planning on F$%&ing tonite are we! |
|
|||
I have no problem with the call. Biyombo does not have legal guarding position and makes contact with the body of the offensive player. If players don't want to get called for fouls like this then they need to do a better job of showing that they got ball first and then got body, which Biyombo did not do.
|
|
|||
Do I even have to say it?
STUPID ANNOUNCERS! "That's a clean block." Okay, but what about all the body-to-body contact? Was that "clean" too? ![]() Biyambo wasn't even close to vertical, and there was more than a little body-to-body contact making this a very easy block foul call. |
|
|||
That's one of those really tough ones. Clean up top but the defender is jumping into James.
Watching the game on the Raptors feed, the announcers have convinced themselves that the NBA is out to get the Raptors. All they talked about was how can the Raptors not shoot one free throw in the first half. Yet the Cavs shot 2 free throws in the 2nd half. No mention of that by the announcers. |
|
|||
It was not clean by any respect. There was a lot of arm contact to get the block and he was not in LGP when jumping forward to make the block. If he got the ball first and then some body contact, I would have had no issue with a no-call, but most of the contact was with body and arm first. It was a close play but the right play.
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
1) It was a good call 2) Calling across the paint isn't a sin 3) Better players are better because they are better. Knowing how to get foul calls is one of many attributes. Looking at plays and learning is great, but this incessant need people have to call out NBA/whatever officials is grating. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
That wasn't the third out | jTheUmp | Baseball | 48 | Fri Apr 29, 2011 07:48am |
He wasn't set!! | slow whistle | Basketball | 29 | Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:29pm |
It wasn't 100-0, but we were getting there | Mark Padgett | Basketball | 9 | Sat Feb 07, 2009 08:59pm |
OK. I wasn't at my best. | Hartsy | Basketball | 11 | Tue Jan 04, 2005 01:34pm |
Wasn't there, but I heard... | Bandit | Softball | 14 | Mon Jun 21, 2004 04:36pm |