KU MD reviewing after a ft

[thedewed]

A follow up. For those that saw the play, if they had caught it in time, do you think the elbow by the ball handler Graham rose to the level that it would have been a flagrant one? The ball handler when accelerating past the defender in the paint used his arm in a clearing motion and got it high enough that it inadvertently caught the defender in the head, and he went down. Accidental, but clearly contact.

and a related question , has the emphasis on paying particular attention to contact to the head, even when inadvertent, been lessened? I'm not aware that it has been, but am being told this.

Thanks,

[crosscountry55]

Originally Posted by thedewed

A follow up. For those that saw the play, if they had caught it in time, do you think the elbow by the ball handler Graham rose to the level that it would have been a flagrant one? The ball handler when accelerating past the defender in the paint used his arm in a clearing motion and got it high enough that it inadvertently caught the defender in the head, and he went down. Accidental, but clearly contact.

and a related question , has the emphasis on paying particular attention to contact to the head, even when inadvertent, been lessened? I'm not aware that it has been, but am being told this.

Thanks,

Had it been reviewed in time, I think they would have called it. I have seen no lessening of FF1s on head contact such as this.

So let's say they did review it in time. Would that cancel the subsequent shooting foul since the ball would otherwise have become dead with the FF1? If not, what is the penalty administration sequence post-review?

[thedewed]

Good questions. Would someone e that should know weigh in? Thx