Texas A+M / UNI

[Raymond]

I agree about advancing the ball, which is to the 28-foot foot line not division line. That excitement doesn't happen with that rule.

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

[IncorrectCall]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

I agree about advancing the ball, which is to the 28-foot foot line not division line. That excitement doesn't happen with that rule.

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

No, the excitement comes from last second shots to win (which happens much more often than this situation ever will).

[Adam]

Originally Posted by IncorrectCall

No, the excitement comes from last second shots to win (which happens much more often than this situation ever will).

Maybe, but there's something to be said for making them earn it (Iowa kid here who had a devastating weekend.)

[Rich]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Go_4eGCDF6Q

[Mr.C]

Thanks for the youtube clip of plays together. It helps me to understand why the officials at that level are so good. They call the game consistently throughout. Not bailing out the offense but allowing defenders in good positions to play defense and force offense to earn it. I am guilty of [at least I think I am] giving in to offense for a slight bump on occasion. I also like an earlier post of coaching offense to stand up straight and not even give defense more help by allowing them to close in.

[johnny d]

Should have been a foul on white 3. Using the this years new rule on an offensive cylinder, white clearly violated the UNI players cylinder and the bump that lead to the turnover, should have been a defensive foul. That being said, the UNI player could have made it a much easier play to officiate by simply stepping into the defensive player instead of continuing to lean further backwards.

[UNIgiantslayers]

I'm extremely biased, so I've withheld comment anytime someone brings this up to me, but any thoughts on the &1 called on Jesperson toward the end of regulation? Obviously any call that goes against UNI is garbage, so I'm just wondering if you guys would be right or wrong

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by johnny d

Should have been a foul on white 3. Using the this years new rule on an offensive cylinder, white clearly violated the UNI players cylinder and the bump that lead to the turnover, should have been a defensive foul. That being said, the UNI player could have made it a much easier play to officiate by simply stepping into the defensive player instead of continuing to lean further backwards.

I thought the same thing. The UNI player did himself no favors by continuing to give his ground though.