Yes C was going the other way. The upward motion stuff is in AR 111:

"Examples of the act of shooting include raising the ball up with the hand or arms to shoot a layup or jump shot.....This act of shooting does not include picking up the dribble, catching (gathering) the ball or advancing on the court with one or both feet."

The NCAAM continuous motion rule does not include the foot movement language that is in the nfhs definition.

Thanks. I downloaded the rule book but not the case book.

Don't be confused. The NFHS continuous motion rule REQUIRES the act of shooting to begin in order for the player to THEN be given the right to complete his customary foot movement and pivoting. The reverse is not true. The foot movement doesn't not equate to the start of the act of shooting.

Simply not true. The defender is in front the entire time. He is allowed to turn his body sideways after already having established ILGP. The offensive player puts his shoulder down and leads with it as he rams into the defender. The offensive player is not airborne at the time of contact, so the sideways movement of the defender is not a factor.

This is an easy PC.

Disagree. Guess we may as well move on.

I would NOT have a shot under NFHS or NCAA.

And, I have a block.

I don't see him extend his arm or anything that would've made me think offensive, so I've got a block with no shots.

I see it. But one could argue that the defender was not legal at the time of contact. I think either call can be supported.

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

No