Video Request: BYU vs Gonzaga

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I am not so sure I agree with this, but it was very close. I can live with the call in live speed.

Peace

He was moving into the shooter the entire time...never stopped.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

He was moving into the shooter the entire time...never stopped.

He does not have to stop, but his feet were planted. The issue is was he there before the shooter went airborne.

Peace

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

He does not have to stop, but his feet were planted. The issue is was he there before the shooter went airborne.

Peace

He can't be moving towards the opponent at the time of contact...and he was. His torso was still moving into the path and into the shooter. Getting the feet on the floor doesn't give you the right to the space until the torso is over the feet. That is a fundamental element of verticality.

[Nevadaref]

Play 1: The defender arrived to his spot in time. The issue for NCAAM is that his right heel is barely on/above the RA. In an NFHS game this is a PC. In this specific contest, block was the correct call, but not for the reason Verne made it.

Play 2: That ball is 95% out of the cylinder. In real time, I believe that the officials have to err on the side of this being a good basket and not BI. To penalize the guy for this seems picky to me.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

He can't be moving towards the opponent at the time of contact...and he was. His torso was still moving into the path and into the shooter. Getting the feet on the floor doesn't give you the right to the space until the torso is over the feet. That is a fundamental element of verticality.

Well I do not know how he is moving forward when his feet seem to be planted at the time of contact. The issue again is if the defender was there on a airborne shooter. That part was very close and I see a way this could have been easily called PC foul under all other circumstances but the RA situation.

Peace

[jeremy341a]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Well I do not know how he is moving forward when his feet seem to be planted at the time of contact. The issue again is if the defender was there on a airborne shooter. That part was very close and I see a way this could have been easily called PC foul under all other circumstances but the RA situation.

Peace

I agree with all of this.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Well I do not know how he is moving forward when his feet seem to be planted at the time of contact. The issue again is if the defender was there on a airborne shooter. That part was very close and I see a way this could have been easily called PC foul under all other circumstances but the RA situation.

Peace

Watch his torso...easy. Just like a player that leans out of his spot without moving the feet, this player shifts his torso sideways after the shooter is airborne.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Watch his torso...easy.

Torso was vertical in their own space.

Peace