Louisville @ Duke - Video Reviews

[Dad]

Originally Posted by Adam

I was thinking the same thing. A reminder for us to look where the contact is likely to occur.

Anyone else tossing this kid in a high school game?

Yup. I use almost the same reasoning when I call a flagrant on dunks/layups when the defense comes from behind and takes out the players legs. No excuse for plays that have a high probability of injuring players.

Seeya~

[Geof]

I agree, thanks to all who post videos!

Question about how a slightly different situation would be handled at the NCAA level: White trips black and there is no call (same as before), but the ball bounces to another black player who goes down and scores. At this point, play is stopped to review the trip. How is this play adjudicated?

[JetMetFan]

Originally Posted by Geof

I agree, thanks to all who post videos!

Question about how a slightly different situation would be handled at the NCAA level: White trips black and there is no call (same as before), but the ball bounces to another black player who goes down and scores. At this point, play is stopped to review the trip. How is this play adjudicated?

1. You're welcome.

2. The penalty for an F1 is two shots + possession to the offended team. The only difference in your scenario is Louisville would've had 2 (or 3) extra points. Louisville would've received a throw-in at the spot nearest the foul.

[JetMetFan]

Play #1: The defender embellished a bit but I'll go with an illegal screen. Whether the defender was moving as the screen was set was so close I can give the defense the benefit of the doubt.

Play #2: Yeah, kind of baffling why the L/new Twas still looking into the lane when Louisville gained control of the ball. I'd have to think it was the T/new L who initiated talk of a review. If the C had seen it I'm thinking he would've had a late whistle.

[Refhoop]

Originally Posted by JetMetFan

Play #1: The defender embellished a bit but I'll go with an illegal screen. Whether the defender was moving as the screen was set was so close I can give the defense the benefit of the doubt.

Play #2: Yeah, kind of baffling why the L/new Twas still looking into the lane when Louisville gained control of the ball. I'd have to think it was the T/new L who initiated talk of a review. If the C had seen it I'm thinking he would've had a late whistle.

Same Duke player is involved in both plays?
Illegal screen is against a player with a history of these.
However, watch #3 in other games - he's also dirty... He's working on his own 30 for 30, "I hate Christian Laettner" story.

1. Play on!
2. Good get... by the monitor.

[VaTerp]

Originally Posted by Adam

Anyone else tossing this kid in a high school game?

I'm just going intentional unless there has been other issues with this player/team.

Originally Posted by bballref3966

Duke gets all the calls.

I'm admittedly biased as someone who grew up a UNC fan and then graduated from Maryland but I know College supervisors who still reference the 2001 UMD/Duke Final 4 game as one of the worst officiated games in recent memory. Duke did "get all the calls" in that game. It was rather pathetic actually.