The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Over and back (backcourt) on back tap (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/100682-over-back-backcourt-back-tap.html)

Adam Thu Jan 14, 2016 04:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dad (Post 976626)
This thinking isn't going to work in all scenarios.

No, but it's a great way to consider whether player control had ever been established.

Dad Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:35am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam (Post 976658)
No, but it's a great way to consider whether player control had ever been established.

Sure, but it's wrong and if someone follows it they won't call some BC violations.

Smitty Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:38am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dad (Post 976708)
Sure, but it's wrong and if someone follows it they won't call some BC violations.

Explain?

bob jenkins Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:48am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smitty (Post 976709)
Explain?

I can think of some examples in college (where a TO can't be granted to a player going OOB or into the BC), but I can't think of any off the top of my head for HS.

Dad Fri Jan 15, 2016 12:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smitty (Post 976709)
Explain?

A player doesn't have to be holding or dribbling the ball for a BC violation.

Smitty Fri Jan 15, 2016 12:43pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dad (Post 976718)
A player doesn't have to be holding or dribbling the ball for a BC violation.

I'm pretty sure he was referring to the action in the front court as the ball was being touched by players - whether to determine whether player control was ever established. That would determine what might happen once the ball is touched in the backcourt.

bob jenkins Fri Jan 15, 2016 12:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dad (Post 976718)
A player doesn't have to be holding or dribbling the ball for a BC violation.

At some point that had to have happened.

Dad Fri Jan 15, 2016 12:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smitty (Post 976726)
I'm pretty sure he was referring to the action in the front court as the ball was being touched by players - whether to determine whether player control was ever established. That would determine what might happen once the ball is touched in the backcourt.

This makes a lot more sense if it's what he meant.

Thanks.

Raymond Fri Jan 15, 2016 01:37pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dad (Post 976730)
This makes a lot more sense if it's what he meant.

Thanks.

Yes, he is referring to the action in the FC. Was there PC in the FC. One test of PC is would you grant a TO while the player in question was in contact with the ball.

Adam Fri Jan 15, 2016 03:09pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dad (Post 976718)
A player doesn't have to be holding or dribbling the ball for a BC violation.

In order to have a BC violation, player control has to be have been established at some point (either in the FC or the BC) so that TC gets established. The "would you call a timeout" guideline only helps determine if there was, at any point, player control. If one is still missing BC violations after that, it's strictly because one does not know the BC rule.

pfan1981 Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:35am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dad (Post 976730)
This makes a lot more sense if it's what he meant.

Thanks.

That is what I meant. My apologies.

When a ball is getting batted around after a shot or a throw in, I think to myself: would I grant a timeout in this situation? If the answer is yes, then I may have the possibility of a backcourt violation. If not, then play on.

AremRed Sat Jan 16, 2016 02:22am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bainsey (Post 976630)
Was there control in the BC, or was it from a throw-in?

No and no.

Sharpshooternes Sat Jan 16, 2016 05:04am

So I had this very play happen to me this week. I was lead in two man and my P called a backcourt violation. I was sure he got it wrong. I just let it be, in this instance as none of the coaches knew that he kicked it. So out of curiosity, I asked the 3 man varsity crew after our game what a partner should do in ths situation. 1 said let them live and die with their call. 1 said if they ask for help offer it, if not, let it be. Cant remember what the third said, maybe go with the inadvertent whistle and give the ball back to the proper team.

So I pose the same question to all of you. How do you help in this situation. I think we have talked about in the past the difference between kicking a rule and making a bad call on bad judgement. I think I should have approached my P with that information and let them change their call if they wanted to. Ready, go.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1