![]() |
|
|
|||
As am I. It did get me thinking...in two man are you going opposite since the inbounding team is on the other end of the court? That would give the T a better chance to see a time out request in their peripheral and the L a better chance of seeing/hearing a request since it puts him/her nearer the bench.
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Very jealous of 3 man areas coming from the land of 2 man. BillyMac, your "Welcome to Connecticut" picture is requested. (my idea of humor)
__________________
Tomorrow is promised to no one. Stay thirsty my friend! ![]() |
|
|||
Since I'm already tableside to administer the completed free throw(s), that's where I administer the throw-in.
I've never had a player ask to move to the other side, but he's entitled, under the rules. Since we're not allowed here to bounce the ball across the basket-line, I'd just move to the other side, and let my partner(s) know.
__________________
Confidence is a vehicle, not a destination. |
|
|||
As the old lead/new trail coming out of a timeout after a goal, I've always just administered the throw-in on the same side of the court where I was when the timeout was granted.
The only exception is in a situation where I've wanted to get one official away from tableside, usually when I'm hoping to move myself/my partner away from a confrontational coach for awhile. For example: Coach gets whacked by my partner, who then moves to the opposite side of the court to administer the throw-in after the foul shots for the T. Next trip down the court, partner calls a foul during a try, reports, and stays tableside. Coach is still steaming, but not enough for a second T. If the timeout follows these shots, I'm going to try to set up so that my partner starts out opposite the table when we resume play. I can only remember explicitly doing this once, but at the time, it seemed like the best course of action. By the time my partner got back tableside again, the coach had calmed down and the game finished without further incident. |
|
|||
table side
I can only speak to 3-person mechanics, but you want the center to have last shot responsibilities, as he/she typically has the best angle to see the ball leave the hand and the clock/light at the same time. In NCAA-W (center) and NFHS (opposite the table), you want that center opposite, so I'd recommend the trail staying table side.
|
|
|||
Bye Bye Birdie ...
No way. Didn't you see what happened to mutantducky?
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) “I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36) |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Side Line Plays | The_Rookie | Basketball | 8 | Sun Jan 22, 2012 01:53pm |
Side-line coverage in two-man | Vinski | Basketball | 29 | Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:51pm |
side line warning | sloth | Football | 4 | Mon Oct 09, 2006 08:36am |
Two Person Mehanics Far Side line coverage | IAABO_Ref | Basketball | 20 | Wed Nov 24, 2004 02:09am |
Lane Line Up | Ref in PA | Basketball | 9 | Tue Oct 28, 2003 02:12pm |