The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 07, 2015, 10:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,239
1) Charge

2) No -- each player can do this 5 times.

3) Yes
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 07, 2015, 10:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 112
1. Had to be there. Typically a PC, but I can see a no call.
2. Charge
3. Yes
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 07, 2015, 11:44am
Dad Dad is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 849
1) Charge.

2) Charge. I've called an intentional before instead of a charge but I really wouldn't do it unless I had to. If they are charging into players on purpose who aren't even looking then mayyyyyybe.

3) Yes, they can.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 07, 2015, 11:48am
Aztec-Irishman
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
1) Charge

2) No -- each player can do this 5 times.

3) Yes
Agreed!

Pantherdreams, thanks for your OP and describing your bias, "god daughter". However, I thought you did a good job trying to describe the situation.

Question 2: as mentioned above by Bob, 5 times and you sit down. Because you used the term, "Not excessive in the act but the frequency.", tough to go "intentional or flagrant". I'm not familiar with anything in the rules that may address this situation as a "travesty of the game". Perhaps other officials can offer another perspective, or an official can deploy my favorite rule: Rule 2 Section 3 REFEREE'S AUTHORITY. The referee shall make decisions on any points not specifically covered in the rules. Tread carefully, but that's the best I can come up with.
__________________
Tomorrow is promised to no one. Stay thirsty my friend!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 07, 2015, 05:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,029
1. No foul. The defender was legal, but off balance and you write that the contact is minimal and not enough to put the defender at a disadvantage. When deciding upon a PC or TC foul, I look for the fact that the offensive player either displaced or knocked the defender down. If the defender falls on his own after minimal contact in an attempt to con the official into giving the opponent a cheap foul, I'm not obliging.

2. Just keep calling the fouls. If any of them are individually ridiculous, consider an intentional personal foul instead of a PC.

3. Yes, the defender may lean back. However, beware of the defender faking being fouled. If despite the leaning backwards, the offensive player still runs the defender over, the play is still a charge. On the other hand, don't get conned by a defender dropping on his own. This action always comes down to judgment.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AAU Non Payment Issues RocRef Basketball 30 Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:21pm
AAU Issues AZ_REF Basketball 20 Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:09pm
Money issues jaym72 Basketball 15 Thu Oct 26, 2006 01:00pm
2 issues PSU213 Football 2 Sat Sep 18, 2004 02:02pm
Two issues MOFFICIAL Basketball 5 Fri Jan 09, 2004 07:45pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1