The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 03, 2015, 12:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 47
Throw-ins

Hello,

When determining when the throw-in ends, rule 42 section 5 states that the throw-in ends when
the passed ball touches or is legally touched by another player inbounds
the passed ball touches or is touched by a player out of bounds (except after a made basket)
the throw-in team commits a throw-in violation.

My question is this - if Team A has the ball for a throw-in, passes the ball in, and a player on Team B commits a kicking violation, does this fall under the "the passed ball touches a player in-bounds", which would cause the throw-in to end? Or, since Team B committed a violation, does that mean the throw-in never ended? Looking at this from the point of view of having an AP throw-in.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 03, 2015, 12:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Note the word "legally" in front of touched with regards to the throwin ending in the first part. Also note that touching and being touched by imply something regarding a kick...is a kick a positive act or a passive act?
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 03, 2015, 10:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
Would a throw in end if either team commits a foul?
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 03, 2015, 11:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 769
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave9819 View Post
My question is this - if Team A has the ball for a throw-in, passes the ball in, and a player on Team B commits a kicking violation, does this fall under the "the passed ball touches a player in-bounds", which would cause the throw-in to end? Or, since Team B committed a violation, does that mean the throw-in never ended? Looking at this from the point of view of having an AP throw-in.

Thanks!
Throw in never ended because of the violation by Team B. Team A would have the ball for a throw in at the OOB spot nearest the kicking violation. The AP arrow would not change because of the violation by Team B and Team a would retain the arrow.

Look at it logically. If that wasn't the case, Team B would not be penalized for their kicking violation.
__________________
Some people are like Slinkies...
Not really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 04, 2015, 12:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mregor View Post
Throw in never ended because of the violation by Team B. Team A would have the ball for a throw in at the OOB spot nearest the kicking violation. The AP arrow would not change because of the violation by Team B and Team a would retain the arrow.

Look at it logically. If that wasn't the case, Team B would not be penalized for their kicking violation.
And yet, if B were to catch the ball while OOB, it would still be a violation on B and A would get the ball but A would lose the arrow. The difference being legally touching the ball in an illegal location vs. illegally touching the ball in a legal location.

Also, we need to remember that this is test season....a lot of the questions lately are likely straight from the test. Once I realized that, I've altered my reply to be more directional than giving conclusive answers. The posters will be a lot better off understanding the rules than being given the answer so they can pass the test.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association

Last edited by Camron Rust; Wed Nov 04, 2015 at 12:41am.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 04, 2015, 08:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
And yet, if B were to catch the ball while OOB, it would still be a violation on B and A would get the ball but A would lose the arrow. The difference being legally touching the ball in an illegal location vs. illegally touching the ball in a legal location.

Also, we need to remember that this is test season....a lot of the questions lately are likely straight from the test. Once I realized that, I've altered my reply to be more directional than giving conclusive answers. The posters will be a lot better off understanding the rules than being given the answer so they can pass the test.

My question was not the result of taking the test - came from me reading through the rule book and reading too much/over thinking the rule.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 04, 2015, 08:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by deecee View Post
Would a throw in end if either team commits a foul?
Since that's not listed as one of the reasons a throw-in ends, ....
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 04, 2015, 09:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Since that's not listed as one of the reasons a throw-in ends, ....
Which begs the question why doesn't it end? I understand for an AP throw in but I am talking about non AP throw in.
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 04, 2015, 09:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 546
There is a case book play that is pretty much the exact scenario -- Case Book Situation 4.42.5
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 04, 2015, 09:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by deecee View Post
Which begs the question why doesn't it end? I understand for an AP throw in but I am talking about non AP throw in.
It "ends" in English, but it doesn't "end" for rules purposes. And, they can't just add it because of the AP issue
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 04, 2015, 10:00am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
It "ends" in English, but it doesn't "end" for rules purposes. And, they can't just add it because of the AP issue
That makes sense.
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 04, 2015, 05:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave9819 View Post
My question was not the result of taking the test - came from me reading through the rule book and reading too much/over thinking the rule.
Fair enough. This time of year, we typically see a lot of "questions" that look a lot like test questions. That doesn't mean they all are, but some of us have been around long enough to see the patterns.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 04, 2015, 06:47pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
Let's Go To The Videotape ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by HokiePaul View Post
There is a case book play that is pretty much the exact scenario -- Case Book Situation 4.42.5
4.42.5 SITUATION: Team A is awarded an alternating-possession throw-in.
A1’s throw-in pass is illegally kicked by B2. RULING: As a result of B2’s kicking
violation, Team A is awarded a new throw-in at the designated spot nearest to
where the kicking violation (illegal touching) occurred. Since the alternating-possession
throw-in had not been contacted legally, the throw-in has not ended and
therefore, the arrow remains with Team A for the next alternating-possession
throw-in. COMMENT: The kicking violation ends the alternating-possession
throw-in and as a result, a non-alternating-possession throw-in is administered.
When the ball is legally touched on the subsequent throw-in following the kicking
violation, the arrow shall not be changed and shall remain with Team A.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fumble on throw in and free throw billyu2 Basketball 9 Thu Jan 17, 2013 12:33pm
Where's the next throw in? stiffler3492 Basketball 3 Sun Dec 18, 2011 12:56am
throw-in after double personal during free throw closetotheedge Basketball 26 Mon Dec 01, 2008 02:39am
3 man mechanic on sideline throw in below free throw line extended!!!! jritchie Basketball 10 Tue Nov 01, 2005 02:43pm
Throw-in spot after throw-in violation zebraman Basketball 6 Sun Dec 12, 2004 08:09pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1