batter interference

[Rich Ives]

The batter was in the box. He made no unusual movements. So where's the interference?

I'd be POed at the catcher if it was my catcher. Let F2 learn how to play the position.

[bob jenkins]

Hmm -- I thought I replied to this thread.

No INT, as described (and as I picture it).

[MD Longhorn]

This is not interference at any level, in any ruleset.

[jicecone]

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn

This is not interference at any level, in any ruleset.

At any level, Mike?

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by jicecone

At any level, Mike?

I believe I did say "at any level". Let me check ... yup, there it is. What's your actual question?

[jicecone]

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn

I believe I did say "at any level". Let me check ... yup, there it is. What's your actual question?

As you see fit, thanks.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by jicecone

As you see fit, thanks.

I can't think of a level where I'd have INT on this either.

(And, if the play is changes so that it is INT, then it is INT at all levels where steailing is allowed.)