The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 16, 2014, 11:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Upper Midwest
Posts: 928
Where was the out possible?
__________________
"I don't think I'm very happy. I always fall asleep to the sound of my own screams...and then I always get woken up to the sound of my own screams. Do you think I'm unhappy?"
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 17, 2014, 08:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt View Post
Where was the out possible?
The batter.

However, 8.4.2 Sit B in the current casebook has the exact same play and it has the runner on third being declared out.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 17, 2014, 09:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spence View Post
The batter.

However, 8.4.2 Sit B in the current casebook has the exact same play and it has the runner on third being declared out.
This FED rule was changed a few years ago. It used to be that the batter was out. Now it's the runner who is out. Someone just forgto to change the answer key.

I think I have heard that this question has been acknowledged by FED (or some state(s) ) to be incorrect.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 17, 2014, 09:15am
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
This FED rule was changed a few years ago. It used to be that the batter was out. Now it's the runner who is out. Someone just forgto to change the answer key.

I think I have heard that this question has been acknowledged by FED (or some state(s) ) to be incorrect.

I don't remember, but does it matter how many outs are remaining?

I feel like I remember reading at some point that w/ two outs we get the batter, w/ < 2 out we get the runner.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 17, 2014, 09:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyg08 View Post
I don't remember, but does it matter how many outs are remaining?

I feel like I remember reading at some point that w/ two outs we get the batter, w/ < 2 out we get the runner.
Not on this play.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 17, 2014, 11:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 323
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyg08 View Post
I feel like I remember reading at some point that w/ two outs we get the batter, w/ < 2 out we get the runner.
You're thinking of batters interference with a runner coming home.
__________________
"That's all I have to say about that."
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 17, 2014, 01:00pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest Ump View Post
You're thinking of batters interference with a runner coming home.
Gotcha
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 17, 2014, 01:07pm
CT1 CT1 is offline
Official & ***** Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,049
R3 (the player who interfered) is out. Don't forget to add a strike to the count if there were less than 2 strikes already.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 18, 2014, 01:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt View Post
Where was the out possible?
Generally in baseball, when a batter hits a fly ball that's caught, it creates an out on the batter.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 18, 2014, 03:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn View Post
Generally in baseball, when a batter hits a fly ball that's caught, it creates an out on the batter.
Not in this case.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 18, 2014, 04:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_riprock View Post
Not in this case.
Really? Before the INT, there was no out to be had on the batter if the ball had been caught? Why, praytell?
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 18, 2014, 08:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 480
Rule 5-1-1e
Ball becomes dead immediately when there is interference by a runner, batter-runner, or a retired runner, the batter , or any person.

Rule 8-4-2g .....If , in the judgment of the umpire, the runner including the batter runner interferes in any way and prevents a double play anywhere, two shall be declared out...
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 19, 2014, 08:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbmartin View Post
Rule 5-1-1e
Ball becomes dead immediately when there is interference by a runner, batter-runner, or a retired runner, the batter , or any person.

Rule 8-4-2g .....If , in the judgment of the umpire, the runner including the batter runner interferes in any way and prevents a double play anywhere, two shall be declared out...
To whom/what was this a response?
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 19, 2014, 12:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 480
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn View Post
To whom/what was this a response?
I was pointing out that in the scenario described in the OP, depending on if additional runners were on base and their actions, the umpire could conceivably award 2 outs on the play described.
For instance if a runner was on 1st and was running on the pitch. If the umpire feels he would have been a dead duck on the appeal play, based on Rule 8-4-2g he could call him out as well. All I am saying is that just because the ball is immediately dead and the runner is out, there are other things to consider on this play.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 20, 2014, 06:57pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbmartin View Post
Rule 5-1-1e
Ball becomes dead immediately when there is interference by a runner, batter-runner, or a retired runner, the batter , or any person.
Be careful with this, in the instance of a potential infield fly, we have to determine if the ball if fair/foul on an infield fly hit down the line. OBR
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Missed Field Goal Question bradriney Football 4 Mon Sep 03, 2012 08:20pm
Missed base question TwoBits Baseball 6 Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:32pm
Missed Base Appeal Question mrm21711 Baseball 18 Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:42pm
Missed NFHS Test Question umpduck11 Baseball 90 Mon Feb 18, 2008 07:18pm
starting clock question on missed free throw? roadking Basketball 8 Fri Nov 17, 2006 03:02pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:10am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1