The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 04, 2013, 12:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
David, I really think your giving way too much credit to the officials signal being the guide to the runner for whether or not a catch is made. I doubt very much if 10% of the time the runners are judging whether to tag up or not on a signal by the official. I will reserve that 10% for traps.

For the most part, at second, you are watching the fielder and at third/first your listening to the coach.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 04, 2013, 12:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Germantown, TN (east of Memphis)
Posts: 783
Quote:
Originally Posted by jicecone View Post
David, I really think your giving way too much credit to the officials signal being the guide to the runner for whether or not a catch is made. I doubt very much if 10% of the time the runners are judging whether to tag up or not on a signal by the official. I will reserve that 10% for traps.

For the most part, at second, you are watching the fielder and at third/first your listening to the coach.
At high levels of play and on well-coached teams, runners are always taught to read the ball and not rely on the coach for baserunning decisions. On a fly ball, waiting for the coach to say "Go!" is Little League stuff.

About the only time runners rely on the coach is when their back is to the ball and something unexpected happens. (i.e. runner advancing to 3rd and the outfielder bobbles the ball or the relay is mishandled.) For instance, you'll almost never see a 1st base coach tell a batter to advance to 2nd on a hit because the batter is expected to see the play and make his own decision.

I disagree. I think the umpire's signal on a shoestring catch that could've gone either way is critical to the runner. Primarily, the runner will watch the play and then, if there's any doubt (and there will be doubt on a shoestring catch), his attention will turn immediately to the umpire for a catch/no-catch ruling. The last thing the runner will care about in that situation is whether the ball was fair or foul. Which, to me, is why it seems so odd that it is taught to give the fair/foul call before the catch/no-catch call.

I admit, I'm thinking about this more as a former (Div I) player of the game than I am as an umpire. It's really not that big of a deal. I'm not losing any sleep over it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/94939-fair-foul-then-catch-no-catch.html
Posted By For Type Date
AnswerParty | Why do they call it a foul ball line if the ball hits it its fair? This thread Refback Fri Apr 18, 2014 01:41pm

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Dead ball, personal foul, fair catch interference..." BktBallRef Football 4 Sun Aug 28, 2011 08:36pm
Fair catch or not phansen Football 1 Thu Aug 24, 2006 08:34pm
Catch or no catch(foul ball)? illiniwek8 Baseball 2 Sat Mar 25, 2006 07:16pm
Try after fair catch lawref Football 21 Wed Sep 17, 2003 03:48pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1