The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 25, 2003, 09:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 345
Re: Re: Re: Warren is misinformed

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jim Porter
Quote:
What makes you think he could bait me? I haven't had a flame or a bad word to say about anybody in two years. I haven't been in any pissing contests, no arguments, no disagreements, I just pop in every now and again to speak my mind and I'm done.
Jim;

Your above statement was such an outrageous mistatement of the truth that I felt compelled to set the record straight. I found numerous examples of flames and insults from your writings but the one quoted below will suffice. It is from the thread the I started that went over 100 replies which we were just discussing. Here is a direct quote from your post in response to Garth. It was from August of 2002, which on my calendar is less that 1 year ago; not even close to 2 years ago as you claimed.

Quote:
"Nanny-nanny boo-boo. You're a liar too. You lied and said you had all that history and tradition and rule on your side and you didn't. You lied. Liar, liar, liar.

See how much fun it can be when the children can't get past name-calling? Talking about being disappointed, Garth, your inability to be civil, respectful, or even adult disappoints me. The Garth I used to know has been replaced with an eight-year-old.

Take your Tonka toys and go home. My mommy won't let me play at your house anymore. She's says you're a bad influence."
Now Jim, are you going to tell us that you were trying to compliment Garth and the above is not an insult.

Furthermore, you make numerous posts that drip with sarcasm and imply others or stupid or lying, just as with the post that started this go-round. But, oh no, in your twisted mind, this is not insulting. I made a post that lightheartedly quoted Garth as saying that I had the longest thread. Garth said that his evidence was only anecdotal and not final. He even predicted that some cretin would come along and make a big issue of finding the longest post. That turned out to be a true statement. For along came an escaped maniac from the asylum to prove him wrong.

Despite your protestations to the contrary, I don't see any difference in the "new" Jim.

Oh, and by the way, I know that you ahave extensively deleted your posts from the past. I am sure that you will do another edit, so that the evidence is erased.

Finally, this post was not meant to be complimentary but I have never claimed or have even tried to be nice. Unlike some people with a mental history, I have never claimed to be Jesus Christ or one of his apostles. Someone else dubbed me "His High Holiness", but that's another story.

Peter

[Edited by His High Holiness on Jul 25th, 2003 at 09:20 AM]
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1