The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 10, 2003, 11:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Warren - Jaksa/Roder and CC support my position. ALL runners advance.

In this thread on eteamz (http://www.eteamz.com/baseball/boards/obrrules/message.cfm?id=45819), CC posted the following (The original question seems to be missing, but note the use of 7.07)

2. The catcher jumps in front of the batter, receives the pitch, and tags the runner. Balk AND catcher's interference. R3 scores on the balk; B1 goes to first because of the catcher's infraction. (OBR 7.07)

= = = =

In chapter 14 on Catcher’s Interference of J/R, Roder writes: “Runners who are not forced and were not stealing must return to their TOP base. Exception: If an R3 was stealing, all runners are awarded their advance base (7.07).”

The bolded “Exception” is as it appears in the book and not my attempt to point it out.

= = = =

They BOTH refer to 7.07 as a valid rule. The J/R exception clearly states that all runners advance if there was a squeeze (R3 stealing)



__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1