|
|||
That's consistent with pro instruction. It does not, however, apply to the play in the OP, as F6 started in his customary position in the infield.
|
|
|||
My latest post was in response to the scenario presented by voiceoflg . As I implied earlier, in the play in STL vs ATL, the shortstop was a legitimate infielder and all other elements were present to declare an infield fly. I have no problem with the call as made in STL vs ATL.
|
|
|||
I finally saw the actual play and I have no problem with the call. It fits all the rule requirements that I am aware of. I guess I could understanding not calling this too, but then I would see people suggesting that someone was thrown out at 3rd or second as being unfair too.
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
I think I'd have called it IFF, after watching F6. But I would not fault a no-call here either.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
The infield fly is possibly the most misunderstood (by fans and coaches)call (umpires typically make. And it comes from all sides.
Last year alone I had : 1)A defensive coach complain that I didn’t call it. (he wanted me to bail out his incompetent defense.) 2)An offensive coach complain that I did call it. 3) An offensive coach complain that I didn’t call it on a bunt attempt. 4 )A defensive coach complain that “Infield fly, batters out if fair!” confused his 3rd baseman causing him to let a popup fall foul. 5) Fans complain and murmur nearly everytime I call it. |
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by Steve Meyer; Mon Oct 08, 2012 at 04:24pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Question everything until you get an irrefutable or understandable answer...Don't settle for "That's Just the Way it is" |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
JJ |
|
|||
Who was camped under the ball? F6 didn't ever make it out to where the ball landed. That's what the not ordinary effort camps whole point is. At least as I understand it. He didn't have time to check his F7 and get under the ball.
|
|
|||
I'm sure he tried to. The problem was, as soon as it appeared F6 was under the ball, he immediately bailed.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
|
|||
As soon as F6 was slowly stepping back and calling for it, that is ordinary effort. Oh look, it doesn't say he has to be "camped" under the ball or stationary. He just has to show ordinary effort to get to the fly ball. Holbrook called it according to the rules, plain and simple.
__________________
Question everything until you get an irrefutable or understandable answer...Don't settle for "That's Just the Way it is" |
|
|||
Quote:
102 responses is enough, I think this horse is dead already. |
|
|||
Quote:
If you still think he was protecting the offense, both runners moved up very easily after the ball struck the ground. Last edited by Adam; Tue Oct 09, 2012 at 10:45pm. Reason: unnecessary roughness |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can anybody explain wild card . . . ? | greymule | Baseball | 5 | Mon Oct 01, 2007 03:47pm |
Game Card | michaelpr | Football | 47 | Thu Aug 05, 2004 07:12pm |
Fed Game Wild Play | Dukat | Softball | 14 | Mon Oct 20, 2003 12:51pm |
Game Card | Ed Hickland | Football | 15 | Fri Sep 05, 2003 09:49am |
Pre Game Card | RefSouthAlb | Basketball | 1 | Tue Jan 21, 2003 10:44am |