The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 11, 2012, 09:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 6
Bunt rule

I'm looking to settle something me and a co-worker were discussing today about bunting. In acquiring my license to do high school games last year, I remember them saying that a player had to "offer at" the pitch if it is out of the strike zone for it to be a strike.

In looking at the NFHS rule book, it says nothing about "offering at" a pitch. It defines a bunt as "a fair ball in which the batter does not swing to hit the ball, but holds the bat in the path of the ball to tap it slowly to the infield."

So my question is, if a kid squares to bunt, the ball goes out of the strike zone, and the kid doesn't move his bat to try making contact, is that a ball? I was always taught as a kid that you had to pull the bat back if it was out of the strike zone and that if I kept the bat out there, then it would be called a strike. Was this just inaccurate coaching?

Thanks ahead of time for whoever can provide some clarification.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 11, 2012, 10:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
Hmm,

Going from memory here . . . maybe Mbyron or Bob J will give details.

To work Federation Baseball you must reference more than the rule book. The Case Book (some where around 7.2 or 7.5) gives the play stating "the bat does not need to be pulled back" there must be an "offer".

T
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 11, 2012, 10:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by khumbert45 View Post
I'm looking to settle something me and a co-worker were discussing today about bunting. In acquiring my license to do high school games last year, I remember them saying that a player had to "offer at" the pitch if it is out of the strike zone for it to be a strike.

In looking at the NFHS rule book, it says nothing about "offering at" a pitch. It defines a bunt as "a fair ball in which the batter does not swing to hit the ball, but holds the bat in the path of the ball to tap it slowly to the infield."

So my question is, if a kid squares to bunt, the ball goes out of the strike zone, and the kid doesn't move his bat to try making contact, is that a ball? I was always taught as a kid that you had to pull the bat back if it was out of the strike zone and that if I kept the bat out there, then it would be called a strike. Was this just inaccurate coaching?

Thanks ahead of time for whoever can provide some clarification.
What you were taught as a kid is not the current correct rule for NFHS (depending on ruleset, it may have been the rule in your organization when you were a kid). The words Offer At are not in the book, but swing is. Basically, for a pitch out of the strike zone to be a strike, the batter must attempt to hit it.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 11, 2012, 10:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 480
Rule 7 section 2 Art 1b
A strike is charged to a batter when a pitch is struck at and missed.

Casebook 7.2.1 situation B.........The mere holding of the bat in the strike zone is not an attempt to bunt.

Rule 10 section 1 Art 4a The umpire in chief sometimes asks for the aid from the base umpire when there is a question as to whether a batters "half swing" is such as to be called a strike. As an aid in deciding , the umpire may note whether the swing carried the barrel of the bat past the body of the batter, but final decision is based on whether the batter actually struck at the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 11, 2012, 10:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 6
Thanks for the quick replies. I looked through the casebook as well but missed it.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 11, 2012, 11:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by khumbert45 View Post
Thanks for the quick replies. I looked through the casebook as well but missed it.
FED makes this explicit, but it's the same for OBR by interp. Holding the bat out by itself does not constitute offering at the pitch.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 11, 2012, 11:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 388
Bunt Rule

In reality, if the Batter leaves the bat out there, it had either be perfectly still or moving AWAY from the pitch. Any movement towards the pitch, I have a "Yes he did".
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 11, 2012, 01:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by nopachunts View Post
In reality, if the Batter leaves the bat out there, it had either be perfectly still or moving AWAY from the pitch. Any movement towards the pitch, I have a "Yes he did".
In reality, that's what everyone else has said: merely holding the bat out is not by itself an offer at the pitch.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 11, 2012, 05:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by nopachunts View Post
In reality, if the Batter leaves the bat out there, it had either be perfectly still or moving AWAY from the pitch. Any movement towards the pitch, I have a "Yes he did".
Needs to be an attempt to hit the pitch, not a robotic response.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 11, 2012, 10:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
Needs to be an attempt to hit the pitch, not a robotic response.
Nothing robotic about it, if the bat moves toward the pitch, I have an offer at the pitch.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NFHS, Bunt Rule sprivitor Softball 13 Sat Feb 20, 2010 12:40am
Bunt flemmer Baseball 74 Mon Aug 06, 2007 05:41pm
when is a sac, bunt a hit dougkrieger Baseball 2 Tue May 03, 2005 05:49pm
Bunt/No Bunt djpfaffe Baseball 8 Wed Apr 24, 2002 07:55am
When is a bunt not a bunt? Dakota Softball 9 Wed Oct 03, 2001 09:57pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1