The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 06, 2003, 11:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 813
I once queried the WUA as to whether the base ump should approach the plate ump if he saw a pitch fouled to the catcher's chest protector and then drop into the catcher's glove----but the PU then calls it a foul tip for strike 3...............

Included in Roder's response was this statement........
    However, we at the MLB level would lean toward getting the play right.
    We have just such instructions written word-for-word in the MLB manual.
    [my emphasis]

When it comes to reversing calls, some at times have supported a List of 5 that was advocated by some but never endorsed by any authoritative opinion. All major sets of baseball rules somewhere advocate the need for the umpire to put aside his perceived ego and "getting the play right" when it's apparent he's made an obvious error. It seems that the Roder statement provides further proof that the need of "getting the play right" is now supported by MLB's maunual (their little black book). Apparently someone forgot to tell the writers of MLB's little black book to read the List of 5.

That concept was apparently adhered to in this situation.
No doubt they would have gotten it correct initially if they were working a 6 man crew......or even a 2 man crew---like where we are expected to always get them right........LOL.


Just my opinion,

Freix


Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1