|
Very well put, Garth..............
and I don't mean to argue.
I only meant to make the point that on the boards I've seen many say, "that's what was taught in pro school", yet when asked to verify that with a pro school document (that which sometimes contradicts the written rule of the book), it was unable to be produced. I'd certainly think that something that specifically contradicts the writing of the rulebook would be something a pro school would put in print if they wanted it followed. Too much can be erroneously passed forward as, "I learned that in pro school" if not verifiable by some means.
While I don't mean to disagree with the teachings of pro school, I only mean to say that they should provide some type of written support---such as that exampled by the PBUC manual---for some of the "added interpretations" that they advocate.......or at least are reported as advocating.
Just my opinion,
Freix
|