Sat Jun 07, 2003, 06:54pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,130
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bfair
Bob, since this reversal wouldn't fall within the once hotly debated "List of 5", your statement appears to support that your understanding would not agree with the "List of 5" as the only calls that could be legally reversed. IOW, your statement supports that it would not be "illegal" for the umpire to reverse this catch/no catch decision---as those supporting the list of 5 would consider such reversal as "illegal." Is that correct?
|
No.
|