What if...

[Suudy]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

You have to wait for the play to finish between 2 and 3. If the initial throw retires the runner, then items 3-5 are ignored.

So R1 gets to keep second if F2's throw retires R2, and the interference is ignored (since R1 is tagged out, and B1 struck out)?

[Simply The Best]

"Coach, I had already inferred you were displeased by my call. Did you have a question?"

JM ___

Simply The Best
The cute one-liner is not only unnecessary it will only further inflame an out of control coach.

"Coach, did you have a question?" is simple, direct and doesn't buy you an unneeded continuation of harassment or argument.

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

You're not reading CoachJM's response with the right tone.

Tone doesn't matter ime imo

[Chris Viverito]

Originally Posted by Suudy

So what about multiple people on base? No outs, 1-2 count, R1 and R2 attempt a double steal. B1 strikes out and interferes with F2's attempted throw to third.

R2 out and R1 back to first?

Yep. In fed-speak that would be R1 out and R2 back to 1st.