The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 7 votes, 2.71 average. Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 02, 2011, 08:57pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ump153 View Post
Perhaps about something, but not this call. He's nailed it. No one working professionally would call it any other way.
I am an amateur umpire, I could not care how the professionals might handle a FED rule call.
Quote:
I used to read about umpires inserting themselves in games. I never really saw an example of that until this thread. Anybody stretching interference to include this play apparently has a need for attention.
Wild specualtion, im amateur opinion.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 02, 2011, 09:40pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simply The Best View Post
Rich is confused.
Highly unlikely.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Reed View Post
SLAS,

Do you have J/R? See See Ch 13, Section 6, Interference by an Offensive Teammate. The term offensive teammate includes retired runners. They say it is interference if the offensive teammate "blatantly and avoidably hinders a fielder's try to field a fair or catchable batted ball or thrown ball."

Rule 7.11 doesn't require a retired runner to instantly disappear from live ball territory. A retired runner who is struck by an errant throw may have interfered, or not. It depends on the situation and the actions of the retired runner. A retired runner who is retrieving a bat may simply be acting as he should. If so, it ain't interference.
You, and J/R, are indeed correct.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ump153 View Post
Perhaps about something, but not this call. He's nailed it. No one working professionally would call it any other way.
No one I know working amateurishly would call it any other way either.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ump153 View Post
Anybody stretching interference to include this play apparently has a need for attention.
ITA.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simply The Best View Post
I am an amateur umpire, I could not care how the professionals might handle a FED rule call.
No rule set was specified in the OP, so the conversation began by a discussion of pro rules, and the J/R manual was referenced specifically. I don't recall anyone saying this was a FED play.

Most of us here professionally umpire amateur baseball. We aren't "amateur" umpires. I lost my amateur standing in 1986.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 02, 2011, 09:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chasing the dream
Posts: 433
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simply The Best View Post
I am an amateur umpire
No doubt.

Quote:
I could not care how the professionals might handle a FED rule call.
I saw nothing that indicated this was a FED situation.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interference Call? Badamk Softball 24 Fri May 01, 2009 01:26pm
Interference call Dakota Softball 3 Mon May 15, 2006 02:48pm
interference or bad call khaas Softball 2 Tue Jun 24, 2003 11:25am
Would you call this interference? bobbrix Softball 12 Mon Jun 09, 2003 02:31pm
Interference or no call jeffrey g. skinner Softball 7 Wed Mar 07, 2001 03:36pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1