The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2011, 01:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Another NCAA question - Backswing INT

This is from the NCAA test....

R1, one out, 1-1 count. B2 is legally in the batter's box. B2 swings and misses and his normal follow-through unintentionally strikes the catcher while the catcher is in the act of throwing to second base in an unsuccessful attempt to retire R1.

a. The batter is not out, strike two and R1 goes back to first base.

b. The batter is out, and R1 is returned to first base.

c. The batter is out, R1 is allowed to keep second base.

d. The batter is not out, strike two and R1 stays at second base.


"A" is correct, right? This would be backswing INT, so no one is out but the runner returns to first. Isn't this the same as OBR? I could not find it in the NCAA rule book.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2011, 07:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
6.2.d.(2)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2011, 08:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_riprock View Post
6.2.d.(2)
Okay, good. I actually just scanned the book yesterday and I was in a hurry, so that's why I couldn't find it.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2011, 12:19pm
JJ JJ is offline
Veteran College Umpire
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 1,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283 View Post
Okay, good. I actually just scanned the book yesterday and I was in a hurry, so that's why I couldn't find it.
If you want to be a successful umpire, don't just "scan the book" looking for answers. Read it thoroughly.
If you want the test answers, read the book, don't ask for the answers here. The purpose of the test is to get us to dig into the book and the manual and the online videos and the REFEREE pamphlet to find the answers. That's how you learn the rules.
Something about "give a man a fish"...

JJ
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2011, 01:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ View Post
Something about "give a man a fish"...

JJ
Perhaps you're thinking of this:

Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day.
Teach a man to fish, and he'll sit in a boat and drink beer for hours.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2011, 02:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ View Post
If you want to be a successful umpire, don't just "scan the book" looking for answers. Read it thoroughly.
If you want the test answers, read the book, don't ask for the answers here. The purpose of the test is to get us to dig into the book and the manual and the online videos and the REFEREE pamphlet to find the answers. That's how you learn the rules.
Something about "give a man a fish"...

JJ
FYI, I already finished the test online. I have a copy of the questions though and this question was in the pool of questions but not on my test. I thought I was right, but wanted to check. I study the book 4-5 times a week, but didn't have much time to look at it yesterday when I was looking for this particular rule reference.

I don't think you have any idea about my level of success from a message board, but thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 08, 2011, 03:06pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Don't get too fired up zm1283...I think the point other posters were making is that many people come on here and don't research, just expect everybody else to do their dirty work for them. Maybe some implied that's what you were doing. Were they wrong...maybe, but that's how it goes on here...which you know based on what you typed in your last post...none of us come on here and talk about ourselves...I can only imagine the people who are on here that have no idea.

In reference to your question (original post) search MLB.com either last year or two years ago Manny got called for backswing interference and there's a great video clip of the play.

Good luck, thanks

Also, check your PM's...thanks!
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 09, 2011, 07:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Oh yeah, we all read the rule books 4 to 5 hours a day, then we come to the forum because we do not know the answer to a simple question, then we get mad because someone calls us on the post, and we are all greater than we seem on the Internet.

This goes on every single year and it is an absolute joke. If you already answered the test, why not say that up front? "I put answer A on the test. Do you think I was correct?" Now, if someone gives you a rash of $hit about posting, you can tell them to pound sand. But hey, we don't know that you are the greatest thing that ever stepped on a baseball field and you just forgot the answer to a simple, basic question that a plate umpire has to judge on every season! Here's a tip..... go find your rule book that you left in the bathroom the other day and keep studying. Your assigner might just present you with a nice JUCO game to suit your talent - or rather, your mouth!
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 09, 2011, 10:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern California
Posts: 396
I actually like talking the rules test questions and think that discussing them before, during or after the test is submitted is great. It gets us thinking and helps us see what others are thinking. I actually wished that the NCAA released the questions prior to the first meeting so we could do round tables about them at the meetings. Let's face it, we work games with 1, 2, 3, or 5 other guys on the field with us. Collaboration is good. And for the record, I should read the rule book way more.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 09, 2011, 11:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy6900 View Post
Oh yeah, we all read the rule books 4 to 5 hours a day, then we come to the forum because we do not know the answer to a simple question, then we get mad because someone calls us on the post, and we are all greater than we seem on the Internet.

This goes on every single year and it is an absolute joke. If you already answered the test, why not say that up front? "I put answer A on the test. Do you think I was correct?" Now, if someone gives you a rash of $hit about posting, you can tell them to pound sand. But hey, we don't know that you are the greatest thing that ever stepped on a baseball field and you just forgot the answer to a simple, basic question that a plate umpire has to judge on every season! Here's a tip..... go find your rule book that you left in the bathroom the other day and keep studying. Your assigner might just present you with a nice JUCO game to suit your talent - or rather, your mouth!
I did tell you that I already took the test. It wasn't on my test though, dickhead. When did I say I was the greatest thing to step on a baseball field? As good as this forum can be, some of the people on it are incredibly arrogant, and you ozzy are certainly in that group. I'm sure you're a gem to work with.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 10, 2011, 05:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283 View Post
I did tell you that I already took the test. It wasn't on my test though, dickhead. When did I say I was the greatest thing to step on a baseball field? As good as this forum can be, some of the people on it are incredibly arrogant, and you ozzy are certainly in that group. I'm sure you're a gem to work with.
Moving right along!!!
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 10, 2011, 06:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
~Sigh~

" . . . dickhead."

Ah, the class of those that claim to be college umpires.

T
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 10, 2011, 08:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim C View Post
" . . . dickhead."

Ah, the class of those that claim to be college umpires.

T
Yes, because I am clearly the instigator in this thread.....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Backswing hit the catcher on a steal attempt johnnyg08 Baseball 21 Fri Jun 04, 2010 07:20am
Backswing (follow through) Interference ctblu40 Baseball 26 Thu Jun 14, 2007 05:21pm
backswing hits catcher ggk Baseball 3 Tue Jul 04, 2006 08:51am
Backswing and Legal Delivery - ASA mcrowder Softball 4 Thu Apr 13, 2006 02:06pm
Catcher's Obstruction on backswing Bluefoot Softball 2 Sun Jun 13, 2004 10:33am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1