The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 21, 2010, 03:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Central KY
Posts: 46
[QUOTE=zm1283;697488]The NCAA is implementing the 20-second clock between pitches (with no runners on) and the 90-second clock between innings (108 seconds for televised games) for 2011. Some conferences are putting actual clocks in the stadiums during the season.

Do you know how the mechanics of this works? Which umpire watches the clock? When does the clock actually start and stop?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 21, 2010, 04:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
The clock in our tournament was mounted over the fence in dead center. Therefore, the PU, with the clock visible over the pitcher's head, must have had responsibility. I'm not sure exactly what the clock did when the digital countdown hit zero, but it must have lit up or buzzed or blinked or something obvious. (No microchips back then. It must have been a mechanical system like the old basketball scoreboards.)

The clock started when the pitcher regained possession of the ball, but I'm not sure of all the details, like what happened if runners were on or the batter stepped out or a pickoff was attempted. I'm also not sure exactly what had to be started or completed by the time the clock ran down.

The NJ newspapers mentioned the clock and the MLB reps but made a much bigger deal over the fact that Bernice Gera umpired some of the games. Some people attended just to see a woman umpire.

I think the clock was gone the next year, and the big news was that Jim Bouton brought his knuckleball to the tourney (for our team).
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 21, 2010, 05:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
[QUOTE=centkyref;697502]
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283 View Post
The NCAA is implementing the 20-second clock between pitches (with no runners on) and the 90-second clock between innings (108 seconds for televised games) for 2011. Some conferences are putting actual clocks in the stadiums during the season.

Do you know how the mechanics of this works? Which umpire watches the clock? When does the clock actually start and stop?
Here is the NCAA rule change. The BU in a 2-man crew or U3 in a 3-man crew carry the stopwatch.

Rule 9-2c: Pace of Play. With the bases unoccupied, the pitcher shall deliver the ball within 20 seconds after receiving the ball. Add penalty to 9-2c: PENALTY: After a team warning, a ball will be called each time the rule is violated. A.R.—Coaches are prohibited from arguing a 20-second rule violation. A warning is given and an ejection of the head coach on subsequent violations.

Rationale: To address pace of play concerns.

Rule 9-2i: Procedure between innings. For non-televised games, teams will be allowed a maximum of 90 seconds between half-innings. For televised games, it is recommended that the time between each half-inning will be 108-seconds between each half inning. For games being played under a television agreement, the time between innings may be extended by contract. The clock starts with the last out of an inning and stops when the pitcher engages the rubber. In the case of an injury or an ejection of the pitcher, the umpire-in-chief shall allow the relief pitcher an adequate time to warm-up.

PENALTY for i: A ball will be called when the defense violates and a strike will be called when the offense violates.

Rationale: The time between innings, in some cases, is a cause of longer game times. Timing and making this sequence consistent will assist in the overall administration of the game.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 21, 2010, 06:35pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Count the commercial breaks during Monday night football...by far more breaks in the action with nothing going on than baseball.

Going to a football game in person is even dumber...watch the players stand around at change of possession for three minutes doing nothing until TV tells them it's okay to keep playing.

I think the main difference is that a true intellectual appreciates the intricacies of baseball, so you have to have some level of thinking to understand and appreciate the game for what it is. Football (certainly the teams prepare), but any idiot can watch it and appreciate it for exactly what it is which is why they can get away with the type of announcing that they have...the casual fan doesn't care about the Tampa 2 defense, but they can understand that if the offense get into the endzone it's a good thing...

I couldn't try to explain to somebody the strategies of baseball, working the count, trying to advance a runner, going to the mound to buy more time for the bullpen pitcher, to throw over to first to see if the batter tips the defense to the fact that he might be bunting. The casual fan can't possibly understand OR appreciate that stuff unless you choose to learn about the greatest game on the planet.

The reasons above, is why it's now become virtually impossible to sit in the stands and watch a game with a "normal" crowd. They literally have no idea what they're talking about.

I'm not saying this to imply that I'm baseball genius guy, because I'm not. I would be interested to read other ideas though.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 21, 2010, 07:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Open up the strike zone. For years we have all learned if a pitch is bordedrline it is probably best to call it a strike, except in MLB. The zones are way too tight.

I agree all this electronic, supposedly accurate technology may have some officials gun shy but i still believe it will open up the game.

Good pitching will STILL prevail.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 21, 2010, 08:13pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
While I am sure the pace could be improved, if you don't like the pace as a fan leave in the 6th inning, or come in the 4th and stay till the end. You will get the amount of time you are asking for.

Measured an NFL game lately, or NHL? A 3+ hour event is very likely.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 21, 2010, 08:19pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by DG View Post
A 3+ hour event is very likely.
Exactly.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 22, 2010, 12:51am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by DG View Post
A 3+ hour event is very likely.
But people are watching the NFL. MNF had more viewers (and the game was bad on top of that) than the LCS. It is much more than pace of the game.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 24, 2010, 09:05am
9/11 - Never Forget
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,642
Send a message via Yahoo to grunewar
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
MNF had more viewers (and the game was bad on top of that) than the LCS. It is much more than pace of the game.

Peace
And, now that the Yanks and the Phils are out, what do we think viewership for the WS will be with Tex vs SF? With the major markets out, only followers of those teams and the purists may watch...... If I'm an advertiser or network exec......
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 26, 2010, 10:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,193
Quote:
Measured an NFL game lately, or NHL? A 3+ hour event is very likely.
Yeah, with a 20 minute half time, at least 6, and as many as 18, timeouts -- not including TV, change of possession, scoring, etc. Take away the planned dead time and the actual on field dead time for an NFL game is less than 30 minutes. You reach that in the 3rd inning of MLB.

Face it: even for my generation (~X) baseball is BORING. The game was perfect for my Dad's generation -- one who grew up either without TV or got it in their mid- to late- childhood. Nothing else to do on a Saturday afternoon for decades. Last 25-30 years pretty well changed all that.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 27, 2010, 07:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: West of Atlanta, GA
Posts: 381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Aggie View Post
Yeah, with a 20 minute half time, at least 6, and as many as 18, timeouts -- not including TV, change of possession, scoring, etc. Take away the planned dead time and the actual on field dead time for an NFL game is less than 30 minutes. You reach that in the 3rd inning of MLB.

Face it: even for my generation (~X) baseball is BORING. The game was perfect for my Dad's generation -- one who grew up either without TV or got it in their mid- to late- childhood. Nothing else to do on a Saturday afternoon for decades. Last 25-30 years pretty well changed all that.
Hence, my ADD comments. It is a different culture now. And, the misconception that there is no "dead" time in football, basketball, or hockey. It is there but many choose not to see it. This pretty much sums up everything. It is the pace many are living at and don't want to watch something that takes its time to develop and finish.
__________________
Question everything until you get an irrefutable or understandable answer...Don't settle for "That's Just the Way it is"
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 27, 2010, 10:16pm
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Aggie View Post
Yeah, with a 20 minute half time, at least 6, and as many as 18, timeouts -- not including TV, change of possession, scoring, etc. Take away the planned dead time and the actual on field dead time for an NFL game is less than 30 minutes. You reach that in the 3rd inning of MLB.
Make that closer to 11 minutes of actions according to a study by the Wall Street Journal

Football Games Have 11 Minutes of Action - WSJ.com
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 21, 2010, 08:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by jicecone View Post
Open up the strike zone.
Good pitching will STILL prevail.
I would think so.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 21, 2010, 08:43pm
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by jicecone View Post
Open up the strike zone. For years we have all learned if a pitch is bordedrline it is probably best to call it a strike, except in MLB. The zones are way too tight.
Wally Bell was doing his best to do that last night...even on non borderline pitches.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 21, 2010, 11:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY state
Posts: 1,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by jicecone View Post
Open up the strike zone. For years we have all learned if a pitch is bordedrline it is probably best to call it a strike, except in MLB. The zones are way too tight.
You're kidding right? If any level should call close to the rulebook, it's MLB. Were you a fan of Eric Gregg?

Want a bigger zone? Get MLB to get a bigger plate. Openly violating the rules is not the best path to shorter games. It would be, however, a great path to increased ejections. That might be fun.

Last edited by MrUmpire; Thu Oct 21, 2010 at 11:52pm.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fixing Screw-ups nickdangerME Softball 3 Mon May 05, 2003 10:56am
Fixing Direction Arrow problem Ref Basketball 9 Tue Feb 13, 2001 12:55pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1