![]() |
|
|
|||
The point is that the OP is so vague that it took someone asking what he meant for any reasonable answer to be given. How hard would it have been for him to mention LLWS somewhere in his post, instead of making a statement that assumes we were either watching what he was watching or reading his mind?
|
|
|||
I am not so sure he got knocked out cold but, I remember saying to my wife that that, was a similar shot that I took last year and convinced me to get a West Vest.
The ball seemed to get behind his throat protector and it wasn't clear what it hit. |
|
|||
Some of those kids are throwing in the mid 70's, which is about the speed a lot of high school varsity pitchers throw. Plus, they're much closer at 46'.
The pitches are shown being equated at over 90 mph at the shorter distance.
__________________
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me? |
|
|||
The distance has (almost) nothing to do with the force the ball imparts. 70 mph is 70 mph, whether thrown from 46', 60', 250'
(Clarification: A ball thrown at 70 mph from 250' will slow down more than a ball thrown at 70 mph from 46'. So, by the time the ball hits the target, it will be moving slower and impart less force. Someone else can do the math. The difference between 46' and 60' is not going to be significant from a practical matter in this case.) |
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Now assuming both balls will come to a stop, some folks will say the two balls slow down the same amount, 70mph to 0 mph. But I know what you mean about their deceleration. In related news, Reds prospect clocked at 105 mph. http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/blog/big...urn=mlb-265783
__________________
SAump ![]() Last edited by SAump; Sun Aug 29, 2010 at 08:58am. |
|
|||
I think a pitch does lose significant velocity over those added 14 feet (from 46' to 60'). I can only guess how much, but even a 10 percent reduction would greatly affect the force at contact.
I'm puzzled at the mph estimates, too. Aren't change-ups in MLB in the 70s? (When the catcher flips the ball back to the pitcher, the scoreboard still shows speed in the 50s or 60s.) I thought that while 90 mph might be a decent fastball, 80 mph was just batting practice.
__________________
greymule More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men! Roll Tide! |
|
|||
Quote:
Hope he gets a season in before its time for ole Tommy John. |
|
|||
He got in the game tonight - 8th inning in an 8 to 2 game. Struck out the first batter and got two ground outs. Something like 10 out of 11 for strikes. Touched 102 on the gun.
I was listening to the WLW postgame and they were giddy like little schoolgirls over this guy. Just don't let Chapman watch the video of Zumaya or Strasburg. Last edited by Sven K; Tue Aug 31, 2010 at 11:37pm. Reason: Added mph |
|
|||
Quote:
---- I happened to be watching this game when it happened. The umpire appeared to have the ball deflect off his chest protector and hit him in the throat/jaw area. It could have happened to a lot of us but this guy was on TV. -Josh |
|
|||
What kind of chest protector.
From the replay, it looked like it was a pitch that was fouled back and bounced off the chest protector upward and caught him in the jaw. I can see why he went down. He will be back doing another game tonight.
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Balloon Chest Protector - Outside Protector | JPaco54 | Baseball | 5 | Mon Jul 06, 2009 01:44pm |
how to use outside chest protector | bniu | Baseball | 21 | Fri May 15, 2009 09:29am |
New Chest Protector | orangeump | Baseball | 12 | Tue Jun 17, 2008 05:16am |
Looking for new chest protector | mrm21711 | Softball | 18 | Sun May 21, 2006 08:06am |
Chest Protector | Rick Friedmann | Baseball | 36 | Tue Apr 04, 2006 08:13pm |