![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
So, all the criticism is due to the lack of basic umpiring abilities exhibited by some of these guys. I think it has been correctly stated that getting a gig like this, even though they are volunteers, does not excuse their lack of basic mechanics and rules knowledge. If you think this is ok.... well that's a sad statement of the expected qualities of those umpires. |
|
|||
|
[QUOTE=Mrumpiresir;690174]Fact is,
I haven't seen you post one quantifiable fact, just opinion. those umpires did not perform well and as a result we will all have to live it down. Live what down? With whom? Who cares? You think in the next game you work a coach is having LLWS flashbacks as he watches you work the game? There is no way you can defend their performance. Go back and read my posts. I haven't said anything about their performance on the field...positive or negative. What I have said is to show them some respect and to stop slamming them. So, all the criticism is due to the lack of basic umpiring abilities exhibited by some of these guys. I think it has been correctly stated that getting a gig like this, even though they are volunteers, does not excuse their lack of basic mechanics and rules knowledge. They call ball, strike, fair, foul, safe and out, they cut into the diamond when the ball is hit to the OF. That's basic LL mechanics, there's nothing lacking. You might not like how they do it...but hey you're not a LL ump. Lack of rules knowledge? Care to be specific? If you think this is ok I'm not their tournament UIC. It's his opinion that matters. .... well that's a sad statement of the expected qualities of those umpires.[/QUOTE] And just what are those expected qualities? Obviously they're different than LLBB's. Last edited by KJUmp; Wed Aug 25, 2010 at 09:19pm. |
|
|||
|
Anyone that knows they are going on TV and goes on TV anyway (which this entire process is obvious they are going to be on TV) is going to get criticized. If you do not want to be criticized, then do not go on TV. If these are "volunteers" then they are volunteering to be on TV. Having been on TV several times myself I did not seek that opportunity, but knew it was realistic if I was going to accept certain assignments or work in the post season. And anything you do on TV is subject to criticism. It comes with the territory. But unlike a situation where I have been on TV, I did not know for sure I would even get the opportunity. These umpires knew they were going to be on TV somewhere in this day and age. If it were me I would do things to not look like I do not know what I am doing. I know it is Little League, but the adults cannot be that naive to think no one is watching.
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
|
KJU, just a moment
Quote:
However, having said that you can't ignore the fact that some of these umpires have not done the quality work we want them to do, or they themselves want to do. the point of the matter is that the LLWS umpires represent all of us as umpires, we are all a brotherhood whether we like or not, and their ability to get the call right (or blow it sky high) are a reflection on us as a group. I want those guys to have a good time, do a good job, and enjoy themselves. Do you really think they are having a great time when the TV lens is looking over their shoulder every minute, and their partners blow calls because they are not doing what they should be doing on the field? And all the time the LL leadership is turning them into a tool of ESPN to throw all umpires under the bus? I can see Joe Blow working 1B in an ESPN game, and his family friends and the like are watching and taping it too. Then Joe makes a mistake he shouldn't have, and the tape doesn't lie; it shows he missed the call from here to eternity, and he was not mechanically sound, which led to the missed call. So now this LLWS umpire is overturned by replay, let's review: 1. ESPN has thrown him under the bus: "Well Joe Blow of poorhouse, anywhere, the 1B umpire just blew that call badly, replay will overturn it." 2. LL has thrown him under the bus again: "We have replay because we want to get the calls right (i.e. 'We don't trust our umpires and Joe Blow's missed call is a prime example as to why')." 3. Now, every time Joe has a wacker the rest of the event he has fans, the coaches, and everyone but his dog questioning him and his competence. Even if he is right, he will be assumed wrong until replay shows everyone he is right. 4. Then he gets to go home, and everyone says, "hey great call you blew on TV at the LLWS." Yeah, KJU, you have some good points, but the other side does too. Listen to them. Last edited by jkumpire; Wed Aug 25, 2010 at 09:20pm. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
You took the time to look at in a rational manner and made several excellent points. None of which were "these guys are terrible, incompetent, they suck, etc." You displayed some empathy to these guys, and in doing so, showed them some respect. When the discussion is on that level, I have no problem listening. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
The WS assignment has always been the DC's & WP's gold watch. It's also a bargining chip to be used by the higher ups to get support for ideas and programs in other areas of LLBB which have nothing to do with umpiring. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Just An Observation | mrmotivation | Basketball | 24 | Mon Jan 21, 2008 02:54pm |
| Another Monk observation | Mark Padgett | Basketball | 14 | Tue Aug 08, 2006 04:38pm |
| fanboy observation | 26 Year Gap | Basketball | 13 | Thu Mar 16, 2006 08:16am |
| OSU/MSU observation | eyezen | Basketball | 10 | Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:55am |