The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 02, 2010, 11:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
It's Gardenshire! You just expect him to get tossed, no big deal anymore.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 02, 2010, 11:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
As for the call and Marquez's appearance and behavior during the argument: embarrassing, unprofessional, astounding, horrible ... anyone?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 02, 2010, 06:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty View Post
As for the call and Marquez's appearance and behavior during the argument: embarrassing, unprofessional, astounding, horrible ... anyone?
Par for the course in Marquez's game.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 02, 2010, 12:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by jicecone View Post
It's Gardenshire! You just expect him to get tossed, no big deal anymore.
So, Gardenhire didn't have a case here? What has happened to MLB umpiring? This continuing sequence of inexplicably missed calls is disturbing. Maybe he was reaching for a snack instead of watching the play.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 02, 2010, 01:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota View Post
So, Gardenhire didn't have a case here? What has happened to MLB umpiring? This continuing sequence of inexplicably missed calls is disturbing. Maybe he was reaching for a snack instead of watching the play.
He did.

But, did you ever hear the story about the little boy that cried "Wolf" all the time.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2010, 08:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 727
[QUOTE=Dakota;684314] What has happened to MLB umpiring? This continuing sequence of inexplicably missed calls is disturbing. QUOTE]

Replay...replay...replay...
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade."
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2010, 01:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: West of Atlanta, GA
Posts: 381
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoBits View Post

Replay...replay...replay...
Great. More of that rubbish now.
__________________
Question everything until you get an irrefutable or understandable answer...Don't settle for "That's Just the Way it is"
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2010, 01:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 175
Getting back on topic, Part B...

Here is something else that I noticed when thinking about it some more (after reading other comments). Where is the call? If you are going to make a no-tag call it had better be immediate and loud.

Looking at the "live" wide-angle, the call is not made until the runner reaches 3B, not when the tag is missed. This makes me think that he either blinked or wanted to screw it up.

Your thoughts?
__________________
Ump Rube
-----------------------------------------------------
Ump (uhmp) shorted form; an official in a sport who rules on plays.
Rube (roob) slang; sports fan who listens to KFAN in Minneapolis, MN.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2010, 02:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ump Rube View Post
wanted to screw it up.
Unless you think he's related to Tim Donaghy, I'm pretty sure this isn't it.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2010, 04:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Unless you think he's related to Tim Donaghy, I'm pretty sure this isn't it.
I don't think he did, it was merely hyperbole.
__________________
Ump Rube
-----------------------------------------------------
Ump (uhmp) shorted form; an official in a sport who rules on plays.
Rube (roob) slang; sports fan who listens to KFAN in Minneapolis, MN.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2010, 03:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 751
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ump Rube View Post
Here is something else that I noticed when thinking about it some more (after reading other comments). Where is the call? If you are going to make a no-tag call it had better be immediate and loud.

Looking at the "live" wide-angle, the call is not made until the runner reaches 3B, not when the tag is missed. This makes me think that he either blinked or wanted to screw it up.

Your thoughts?
Making an out call when the tag is applied takes care of this.

Not making an out call when the tag is missed (and the runner has not reached the base) also takes care of this.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2010, 04:52pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ump Rube View Post
Here is something else that I noticed when thinking about it some more (after reading other comments). Where is the call? If you are going to make a no-tag call it had better be immediate and loud.

Looking at the "live" wide-angle, the call is not made until the runner reaches 3B, not when the tag is missed. This makes me think that he either blinked or wanted to screw it up.

Your thoughts?
I completely disagree with you. He should do nothing. Because I think you only need one signal. He is not safe until he gets back to the base, not in the middle of the running lane where a possible tag might be made. One signal and one call. Because is he going to give multiple tag signals on several tag attempts and then call him out when he is finally out?

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2010, 07:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,219
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
I completely disagree with you. He should do nothing. Because I think you only need one signal. He is not safe until he gets back to the base, not in the middle of the running lane where a possible tag might be made. One signal and one call. Because is he going to give multiple tag signals on several tag attempts and then call him out when he is finally out?

Peace
The tag was a "play" and deserves a call. If the tag had been missed, then both the runer and the fielder need to know it so they can then act appropriately.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 07, 2010, 09:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 727
Quote:
Originally Posted by GA Umpire View Post
Great. More of that rubbish now.


It's either that, or go with Pete's suggestion about MLB taking over umpire development.
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight pizanno Basketball 27 Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am
An attempt to draw attention from the "85% missed this one" thread dash_riprock Baseball 21 Sat Feb 23, 2008 03:11am
Can "FOUL" be made "FAIR"? PAT THE REF Baseball 60 Sat Feb 24, 2007 09:01pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1