The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 14, 2010, 06:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Farmland west of Chicago
Posts: 74
Send a message via ICQ to BK47
Mike, I have already admitted to my mistake. If you are joining the party late please try to read everything.

I agree THE HANDS ARE NOT PART OF THE BAT. My mistake for saying that.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 14, 2010, 07:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by BK47 View Post
Mike, I have already admitted to my mistake. If you are joining the party late please try to read everything.

I agree THE HANDS ARE NOT PART OF THE BAT. My mistake for saying that.
You are correct - I apologize for the overzealous venom.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 14, 2010, 07:02pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
So, the hands are part of the bat, right?







__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 14, 2010, 07:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve View Post
So, the hands are part of the bat, right?







Steve,

That is correct:

Quote:
8. Contact with the ball
In these Laws,
(a) reference to the bat shall imply that the bat is held in the batsman’s hand or a glove worn on his hand, unless stated otherwise.

(b) contact between the ball and
either (i) the bat itself
or (ii) the batsman’s hand holding the bat
or (iii) any part of a glove worn on the batsman’s hand holding the bat
or (iv) any additional materials permitted under 3, 5 or 6
shall be regarded as the ball striking or touching the bat, or being struck by the bat.
JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 14, 2010, 07:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve View Post
So, the hands are part of the bat, right?
Yes, Steve, and the foot is part of the base, the head is part of the helmet and the butt is part of the base line.

And if you give me a little time, I'll find something that the testicles can be part of!

__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 14, 2010, 09:32pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) View Post
Steve,

That is correct:



JM
And you, sir, are out LBW.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 15, 2010, 06:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Farmland west of Chicago
Posts: 74
Send a message via ICQ to BK47
ozzy, funny you should say that, the foot is part of the base it seems.

saw a play last weekend in the College Semi-regionals (at least I believe it was the semi-regionals). Anyway, R1 on second, R2 on first. RHP in the setup, see's R1 head for 3rd. Pitcher steps off and runs toward R1 driving him back to second. It seemed as though Pitcher waited to long to throw the ball to whoever was covering second (lets just say it was SS). SS had his foot in front of the bag and R1 slide into and was touching SS foot, not the base as SS got the ball and touched R1. U3 had a great angle, saw the whole play and still called R1 safe while only touching SS foot.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 15, 2010, 06:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 109
At least these guys got it right.

Baseball Video Highlights & Clips | CIN@WSH: Desmond is ejected after throwing his helmet - Video | MLB.com: Multimedia
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 15, 2010, 08:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
What guys and what did they get right? Joe West's a disgrace? Well, maybe they got that right.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 15, 2010, 09:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 109
The umpires got the call right by calling the runner out as his foot did not remain in contact with the base. It remained in contact with the fielder's foot. See the post by BK47.
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 15, 2010, 09:32am
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty View Post
What guys and what did they get right? Joe West's a disgrace? Well, maybe they got that right.
I know you don't care for him, but what do you think he did wrong here?
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 15, 2010, 09:55am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty View Post
What guys and what did they get right? Joe West's a disgrace? Well, maybe they got that right.
I guess I'm a disgrace, too. I'd toss someone for throwing his helmet like that in any game I work.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 15, 2010, 11:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
Nothing specific, just Joe West's a disgrace to umpiring. They got that right.

I love the game and I love umpiring and I respect both immensely. So how could I possibly approve of Joe West and the manner in which he defames both the game and the umpiring profession?

If he is not a disgrace to umpiring, I guess I am missing something. Try to list some of the ways that he is not a disgrace to umpiring, rather than condemn me for bringing it up, or assume I am biased against the guy personally, which I am not. As a person, I both liked and spent time with the guy in past years. But this is now, and he is now a disgrace to umpiring. There are literally hundreds of qualified umpires dreaming of a shot at a spot he is filling in a way that is a colossal embarrassment to the profession.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 15, 2010, 12:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
Seriously, can anyone please list the ways that Joe West is not a disgrace to the umpiring profession. Everyone who defends his umpiring does so with an emptiness that is quite glaring.

I'm not even asking to list glowing attributes, just some things that make him less than a disgrace as an umpire.
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 15, 2010, 12:03pm
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
I asked about his handling this situation, not his entire body of work.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:02pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1