The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   well, THERE's a new one (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/58394-well-theres-new-one.html)

BK47 Mon Jun 14, 2010 06:51pm

Mike, I have already admitted to my mistake. If you are joining the party late please try to read everything.

I agree THE HANDS ARE NOT PART OF THE BAT. My mistake for saying that.

MD Longhorn Mon Jun 14, 2010 07:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BK47 (Post 681921)
Mike, I have already admitted to my mistake. If you are joining the party late please try to read everything.

I agree THE HANDS ARE NOT PART OF THE BAT. My mistake for saying that.

You are correct - I apologize for the overzealous venom. :)

SanDiegoSteve Mon Jun 14, 2010 07:02pm

So, the hands are part of the bat, right?







:eek:

UmpJM Mon Jun 14, 2010 07:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 681924)
So, the hands are part of the bat, right?







:eek:

Steve,

That is correct:

Quote:

8. Contact with the ball
In these Laws,
(a) reference to the bat shall imply that the bat is held in the batsman’s hand or a glove worn on his hand, unless stated otherwise.

(b) contact between the ball and
either (i) the bat itself
or (ii) the batsman’s hand holding the bat
or (iii) any part of a glove worn on the batsman’s hand holding the bat
or (iv) any additional materials permitted under 3, 5 or 6
shall be regarded as the ball striking or touching the bat, or being struck by the bat.
JM

ozzy6900 Mon Jun 14, 2010 07:28pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 681924)
So, the hands are part of the bat, right?
:eek:

Yes, Steve, and the foot is part of the base, the head is part of the helmet and the butt is part of the base line.

And if you give me a little time, I'll find something that the testicles can be part of!

:eek:

Rich Mon Jun 14, 2010 09:32pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) (Post 681927)
Steve,

That is correct:



JM

And you, sir, are out LBW.

BK47 Tue Jun 15, 2010 06:26am

ozzy, funny you should say that, the foot is part of the base it seems.

saw a play last weekend in the College Semi-regionals (at least I believe it was the semi-regionals). Anyway, R1 on second, R2 on first. RHP in the setup, see's R1 head for 3rd. Pitcher steps off and runs toward R1 driving him back to second. It seemed as though Pitcher waited to long to throw the ball to whoever was covering second (lets just say it was SS). SS had his foot in front of the bag and R1 slide into and was touching SS foot, not the base as SS got the ball and touched R1. U3 had a great angle, saw the whole play and still called R1 safe while only touching SS foot.

txump81 Tue Jun 15, 2010 06:41am

At least these guys got it right.

Baseball Video Highlights & Clips | CIN@WSH: Desmond is ejected after throwing his helmet - Video | MLB.com: Multimedia

Kevin Finnerty Tue Jun 15, 2010 08:47am

What guys and what did they get right? Joe West's a disgrace? Well, maybe they got that right.

txump81 Tue Jun 15, 2010 09:05am

The umpires got the call right by calling the runner out as his foot did not remain in contact with the base. It remained in contact with the fielder's foot. See the post by BK47.

Welpe Tue Jun 15, 2010 09:32am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty (Post 681970)
What guys and what did they get right? Joe West's a disgrace? Well, maybe they got that right.

I know you don't care for him, but what do you think he did wrong here?

Rich Tue Jun 15, 2010 09:55am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty (Post 681970)
What guys and what did they get right? Joe West's a disgrace? Well, maybe they got that right.

I guess I'm a disgrace, too. I'd toss someone for throwing his helmet like that in any game I work.

Kevin Finnerty Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:56am

Nothing specific, just Joe West's a disgrace to umpiring. They got that right.

I love the game and I love umpiring and I respect both immensely. So how could I possibly approve of Joe West and the manner in which he defames both the game and the umpiring profession?

If he is not a disgrace to umpiring, I guess I am missing something. Try to list some of the ways that he is not a disgrace to umpiring, rather than condemn me for bringing it up, or assume I am biased against the guy personally, which I am not. As a person, I both liked and spent time with the guy in past years. But this is now, and he is now a disgrace to umpiring. There are literally hundreds of qualified umpires dreaming of a shot at a spot he is filling in a way that is a colossal embarrassment to the profession.

Kevin Finnerty Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:02pm

Seriously, can anyone please list the ways that Joe West is not a disgrace to the umpiring profession. Everyone who defends his umpiring does so with an emptiness that is quite glaring.

I'm not even asking to list glowing attributes, just some things that make him less than a disgrace as an umpire.

Welpe Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:03pm

I asked about his handling this situation, not his entire body of work.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1