Is catching a called strike too much to ask?

[ManInBlue]

Uncaught strike tonight brought the only comment I heard about the strike zone. It wasn't HS boys and it wasn't filled with talent. Wide zone, been calling it all night - uncaught made it look bad. I was getting all the strikes I could!!

I agree - a strike is a strike but borderline pitches have to get caught to get called. I hear all the time "Catch that and it'll be a strike" and I think to myself "at least there's one person that understands how this goes."

[pastordoug]

Quote: "speaking to an NCAA audience"

Since I do not do NCAA this is just my opinion but I could understand that point of view much more than I could HS. My reason would be that at the NCAA level (again I do no ump NCAA) your pitchers are much better with more accurate. So I suspect that this is less of a problem...

I still have a hard time calling a strike when the catcher drops it... Not saying I haven't but still hard for me to do....

Would like to hear from those doing NCAA concerning my assumptions.

[GerryB]

Two coaches, same DIII league, one comes unglued if a drop is a strike the other if it isn't. Dread getting them in the same game.

In lower NCAA "up here" pitching is not a strength, so for me strikes are strikes, unless borderline. Higher levels I think are moving that way too.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by pastordoug

Quote: "speaking to an NCAA audience"

Since I do not do NCAA this is just my opinion but I could understand that point of view much more than I could HS. My reason would be that at the NCAA level (again I do no ump NCAA) your pitchers are much better with more accurate. So I suspect that this is less of a problem...

I still have a hard time calling a strike when the catcher drops it... Not saying I haven't but still hard for me to do....

Would like to hear from those doing NCAA concerning my assumptions.

Call the strike. That said, if you "can't decide" whether the pitch was a strike, how the catcher handles it (or not) can help you decide.

[SanDiegoSteve]

The catchers in my adult league many times take the blame with their pitchers, as if the way they caught the ball influenced my ball call. Sometimes they are right, but often I tell them, "no, that was a ball anyway."

[David B]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Call the strike. That said, if you "can't decide" whether the pitch was a strike, how the catcher handles it (or not) can help you decide.

To me, that is the key point, and a very good observation. Often, the way F2 catches the marginal pitch is what causes him to drop it and thus often, it makes it easier for the umpire to call the pitch a ball.

Thanks
David

[MrUmpire]

In my experience, at the NCAA level most dropped strikes either crossed up the catcher or are difficult pitches to secure regardless of their location. Those that catch the zone clearly I call strikes. Those that "might have" if I had the opporutnity of a better look at the end, are balls.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by MrUmpire

In my experience, at the NCAA level most dropped strikes either crossed up the catcher or are difficult pitches to secure regardless of their location. Those that catch the zone clearly I call strikes. Those that "might have" if I had the opporutnity of a better look at the end, are balls.

Yep. Another, and perhaps better, way of saying what I meant.

[David B]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Yep. Another, and perhaps better, way of saying what I meant.

Agreed, you both made this very clear as to what I've called, observed, and been taught.

Thanks
David