The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 28, 2010, 07:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 19
Is catching a called strike too much to ask?

(H.S. level and above)
A strike is a strike, I get it and I have heard the argument from both sides but, I still find it hard to call a strike if the catcher can't hold on to the pitch. For some reason, I feel this is happening in my games more this year than prior years. I'm starting to second guess myself and wonder if I should just start calling the strike even though the catcher drops the ball. I would love to hear from other on how they deal with this issue.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 28, 2010, 07:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

Bulldog,

When I first started doing HS Varsity games, I would not call a strike that the catcher did not catch.

Then, one time, I thought to myself, "Phuck it, I don't care. That's STILL a strike." And I said as I pointed, instead of just "strike", "That's a STRIKE, anyway!"

Nobody had a problem with it.

After that I saw a video of Jon Bible speaking to an NCAA audience discouraging giving too much weight to the consideration of how the catcher caught the pitch in making your ball/strike decision. Even at the NCAA level. It made sense to me.

On a borderline pitch, the catcher has to catch it (preferably, "well"). On a "cockshot", it's STILL a strike.

JMO.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 28, 2010, 09:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
My three favorite words in umpiring baseball.

STRIKE

SOUT

SEEYALATER
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 28, 2010, 10:34pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) View Post
Bulldog,

When I first started doing HS Varsity games, I would not call a strike that the catcher did not catch.

Then, one time, I thought to myself, "Phuck it, I don't care. That's STILL a strike." And I said as I pointed, instead of just "strike", "That's a STRIKE, anyway!"

Nobody had a problem with it.

After that I saw a video of Jon Bible speaking to an NCAA audience discouraging giving too much weight to the consideration of how the catcher caught the pitch in making your ball/strike decision. Even at the NCAA level. It made sense to me.

On a borderline pitch, the catcher has to catch it (preferably, "well"). On a "cockshot", it's STILL a strike.

JMO.

JM
Agree, borderline not caught gets balled. No question pitches are STRIKES. I have seen perfect strikes pop out of the mitt, and I am not missing that called STRIKE.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 28, 2010, 10:43pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
I agree. F2 gotta stick the border pitch. Obvious strike...is a strike.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 29, 2010, 09:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 469
Uncaught strike tonight brought the only comment I heard about the strike zone. It wasn't HS boys and it wasn't filled with talent. Wide zone, been calling it all night - uncaught made it look bad. I was getting all the strikes I could!!

I agree - a strike is a strike but borderline pitches have to get caught to get called. I hear all the time "Catch that and it'll be a strike" and I think to myself "at least there's one person that understands how this goes."
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 29, 2010, 11:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 91
Quote: "speaking to an NCAA audience"

Since I do not do NCAA this is just my opinion but I could understand that point of view much more than I could HS. My reason would be that at the NCAA level (again I do no ump NCAA) your pitchers are much better with more accurate. So I suspect that this is less of a problem...

I still have a hard time calling a strike when the catcher drops it... Not saying I haven't but still hard for me to do....

Would like to hear from those doing NCAA concerning my assumptions.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 30, 2010, 07:17am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 77
Two coaches, same DIII league, one comes unglued if a drop is a strike the other if it isn't. Dread getting them in the same game.

In lower NCAA "up here" pitching is not a strength, so for me strikes are strikes, unless borderline. Higher levels I think are moving that way too.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 30, 2010, 07:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastordoug View Post
Quote: "speaking to an NCAA audience"

Since I do not do NCAA this is just my opinion but I could understand that point of view much more than I could HS. My reason would be that at the NCAA level (again I do no ump NCAA) your pitchers are much better with more accurate. So I suspect that this is less of a problem...

I still have a hard time calling a strike when the catcher drops it... Not saying I haven't but still hard for me to do....

Would like to hear from those doing NCAA concerning my assumptions.
Call the strike. That said, if you "can't decide" whether the pitch was a strike, how the catcher handles it (or not) can help you decide.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 30, 2010, 08:45am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
The catchers in my adult league many times take the blame with their pitchers, as if the way they caught the ball influenced my ball call. Sometimes they are right, but often I tell them, "no, that was a ball anyway."
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 30, 2010, 12:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Call the strike. That said, if you "can't decide" whether the pitch was a strike, how the catcher handles it (or not) can help you decide.
To me, that is the key point, and a very good observation. Often, the way F2 catches the marginal pitch is what causes him to drop it and thus often, it makes it easier for the umpire to call the pitch a ball.

Thanks
David
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 30, 2010, 12:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY state
Posts: 1,504
In my experience, at the NCAA level most dropped strikes either crossed up the catcher or are difficult pitches to secure regardless of their location. Those that catch the zone clearly I call strikes. Those that "might have" if I had the opporutnity of a better look at the end, are balls.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 30, 2010, 01:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrUmpire View Post
In my experience, at the NCAA level most dropped strikes either crossed up the catcher or are difficult pitches to secure regardless of their location. Those that catch the zone clearly I call strikes. Those that "might have" if I had the opporutnity of a better look at the end, are balls.
Yep. Another, and perhaps better, way of saying what I meant.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 30, 2010, 07:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Yep. Another, and perhaps better, way of saying what I meant.
Agreed, you both made this very clear as to what I've called, observed, and been taught.

Thanks
David
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 01, 2010, 09:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 19
I worked a couple games today in a H.S. showcase tournament and had an opportunity to call that "cockshot" drop strike and did. I didn’t get a peep from either bench, almost as if they expected it to be called. I used to frown upon those that called dropped strikes because I thought it was a result of poor timing. I still agree that borderline pitches need to be caught but maybe always catching that dropped strike is too much to ask. Thanks to all for the advice.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
strike/called 3rd strike calls chuckfan1 Baseball 8 Tue May 11, 2010 12:44pm
What they want called, and what is called (Strike Zone again!) FUBLUE Softball 30 Tue May 13, 2008 05:14am
FP: Called Strike Three Stu Clary Softball 16 Tue Mar 25, 2008 08:09am
Called third strike if hits your hand? trichards Softball 2 Fri May 28, 2004 12:17pm
Called strike Fastpitchnutz Softball 23 Thu Jan 29, 2004 06:56am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1