The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 21, 2010, 01:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Far south Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 43
Reebock Vector O bat..Legal in Fed?

There is a team that has a Reebock Vector O bat (this bat has holes in the shaft) in our league (Fed Rules). Some umpires let him use it, others don't. Is it a legal bat?

Last edited by kheisner; Wed Apr 21, 2010 at 01:53pm.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 21, 2010, 01:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
No.
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 21, 2010, 02:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Sorry, Walt, but the answer is "yes."

The NFHS originally banned this bat 2 years ago, along with the De Marini. The big boys sued, and NFHS reversed itself.

Per any NFHS bigwig you'd like to name (I heard most recently from Jerry Snodgrass and Kyle McNeely), the Vector O is LEGAL until the new bat specs kick in in 2012.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 21, 2010, 02:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 11
Per the NFHS press release:
A change to Rule 1-3-2 regarding bat specifications was made in the hope it will clarify bat compliance. The rule, which will be effective January 1, 2012, specifies that the bat should be a “smooth cylinder implement from the top of the cap to the top of the knob.”

“The committee was looking to clarify the rule and make the purchase of bats an easier process,” said Elliot Hopkins, NFHS director of educational services and liaison to the Baseball Rules Committee. “We want to make sure that kids and parents know what is permissible.”

The change will also require that all non-wood bats meet the Batted Ball Coefficient of Restitution (BBCOR) performance standard, which is the standard used by the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Formerly, non-wood bats had to meet the Ball Exit Speed Ratio (BESR) standard.

The new rule also states that non-wood bats must be labeled with a rectangular certification mark “a minimum of a half-inch on each side and located on the barrel of the bat in any contrasting color.” The new standard ensures that performances by non-wood bats are more comparable to those of wood bats. It’s also expected to minimize risk, improve play and increase teaching opportunities.

“After working with the NCAA and having access to its research, we’ve concluded it’s in our best interest to make this change,” Hopkins said. “BBCOR includes the BESR standard, so we’re actually expanding upon our current standard, which will be more appropriate for our age and skill level.”
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 21, 2010, 04:12pm
JJ JJ is offline
Veteran College Umpire
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 1,122
Despite that rule book quote that the bat must be a "smooth cylinder", the Vector O bat IS LEGAL in FED this year, as is every bat that meets the BESR standards and it so marked. If you read your rule book it says the new BBCOR standards take effect in 2012.

Odds are it may NOT be legal in 2012, when the BBCOR standards take effect.

The Vector O is legal.

JJ

Last edited by JJ; Thu Apr 22, 2010 at 09:32am.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 21, 2010, 04:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
And

The "Mattingly Bat" (which THRIVES on not being "cylindrical") is also legal.

The 2012 BBCOR rulings will eliminate the issue but for now the NFHS has said the bats are legal (a spring ruling last year). Note: Any STATE can declare the bats illegal.

T
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 21, 2010, 09:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ View Post

Odds are it may NOT be legal NEXT year, when the BBCOR standards take effect.

JJ
I thought it was 2012.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 22, 2010, 09:31am
JJ JJ is offline
Veteran College Umpire
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 1,122
My bad - it's 2012. I'm getting ahead of myself....

I change my OP.

JJ
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Legal or not legal player splitveer Basketball 4 Wed Feb 10, 2010 01:10pm
Legal or not? Jim D Football 20 Tue Aug 28, 2007 06:11pm
Legal or not? MJT Football 6 Fri Aug 10, 2007 11:44am
Is this Legal? muresan Basketball 4 Wed Apr 07, 2004 09:38am
legal or not ericdenn Basketball 12 Sun Apr 07, 2002 06:08pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1