![]() |
|
|||
|
DG,
Does it seem evident to you that the NFHS doesn't insist on (strict) enforcement of the "authenticating mark" requirement - since that's what their published Official Interpretation is and has been since the language entered the rule book. (That was the "point" of my earlier question about you having a BRD. See Equipment: Baseballs: Approved.) Also, since you never really answered, I wonder if you would say what, exactly, you would do if - strictly hypothetically, of course, willing suspension of disbelief, & all that, since this simply wouldn't happen in NC - there were no properly marked balls at the game site where you showed up to call a game, but an ample supply of baseballs that appeared perfectly suitable, other than lack of the mark? Thanks. JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all. |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight | pizanno | Basketball | 27 | Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am |
| "Hideout" Play--Legal or Not? | reff4e | Football | 10 | Mon Nov 26, 2007 08:28pm |
| New "AP Legal Touch" Rule/Different Interpretation | BayStateRef | Basketball | 142 | Wed Jul 18, 2007 10:53pm |