![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
The adult baseball leagues here use local HS and college fields, and 95% of them feature no foul lines in the infield and 90% have no lines on the outfield grass (some are painted on fortunately). If it's not HS season, you get the fields as-is.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25 |
|
|||
|
Quote:
For HS games, legal balls, and lines on the field, including batter and coaches boxes are required. |
|
|||
|
DG, where do you work your games? In my part of the world, particuarly for non-varsity games, we take what we can get. I personally don't quibble about balls, bats, or lines. Some schools use City facilities and with budgets all messed up out here, field maintenance is sometimes non-existant.
I'm sure you would agree, the goal is to get them on the field and get the game played, right?
__________________
Bob P. ----------------------- We are stewards of baseball. Our customers aren't schools or coaches or conferences. Our customer is the game itself. |
|
|||
|
my .02
Quote:
In my time, I have umpired quite a few rural HS teams that barely had uniforms..... I had a game a few years back when both teams had NO new baseballs to use for the game......nobody had thought to bring any......I went to my car, and brought out 2 new PONY league balls.....said to the coaches, we could play with these or you can reschedule.....(after they paid me of course....) they agreed, we played the game...... |
|
|||
|
My state (not my association) expects us to require legal baseballs. They do not expect us to measure the height of the rubber above the plate. So, HS coaches always have the correct baseballs, and we don't worry about the mound height.
It sounds to me like you get what you ask for. If a state expects legal baseballs, they will instruct the coaches and umpires on that fact and they will get legal baseballs. If they don't expect it then coaches will supply whatever they have and umpires will not worry about what is supplied. It seems evident here that some states don't care about enforcing the legal baseball rule, and therefore umpires don't care. |
|
|||
|
DG,
Does it seem evident to you that the NFHS doesn't insist on (strict) enforcement of the "authenticating mark" requirement - since that's what their published Official Interpretation is and has been since the language entered the rule book. (That was the "point" of my earlier question about you having a BRD. See Equipment: Baseballs: Approved.) Also, since you never really answered, I wonder if you would say what, exactly, you would do if - strictly hypothetically, of course, willing suspension of disbelief, & all that, since this simply wouldn't happen in NC - there were no properly marked balls at the game site where you showed up to call a game, but an ample supply of baseballs that appeared perfectly suitable, other than lack of the mark? Thanks. JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all. |
|
|||
|
UMPJM
Why did you ask the original question since you have BRD in hand with a 1999 interpretation? It is not uncommon for FED to issue an interpretation that never shows up in Case Book, such as this one, from 1999 (gorilla arm another example). It was not long ago that the state made this is a point for discussion at state meeting, apparently unaware of 1999 FED interpretation, that essentially, they really did not mean it when the rule was put in the book. To answer your very hypothetical question, in the very unlikely event that I was presented with baseballs that did not meet the rule, I would advise the coach that legal baseballs need to be used, and if none were available on site, we would discuss at the plate meeting and both coaches would recognize that official baseballs were not being used, and both were agreeable to their use before we would play the game. Afterwards I would report this to my assignor. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight | pizanno | Basketball | 27 | Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am |
| "Hideout" Play--Legal or Not? | reff4e | Football | 10 | Mon Nov 26, 2007 08:28pm |
| New "AP Legal Touch" Rule/Different Interpretation | BayStateRef | Basketball | 142 | Wed Jul 18, 2007 10:53pm |