The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old Sat Nov 07, 2009, 12:38am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Greymule and Kevin F:

This is your official reminder.



Oh, be sure to return the favor!
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 08, 2009, 07:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty View Post
It doesn't give the appearance of anything if it isn't brought up, and it wouldn't be brought up if our society had its priorities in order and had a more realistic interpretation of true freedom and a contemporary outlook on human sexuality. It's only anyone's business if it comes out and there's a conflict. And if no one knows, there's no conflict. And no one should know, or even ask.
To me, it's not the sex that's the issue. The issue is the appearance of favoritism, and it stems from fraternization, not sex.

For example, if a judge was caught dating or spending more time with a lawyer, questions will come out on whether he favored that lawyer in court proceedings. Whether they were in bed together doesn't matter much at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty View Post
We're laughingstocks all around the modern world. Cases like Clinton's, Letterman's and even Mark Sanford's make us look like fools when it causes a national uproar.
Sanford's case was more about lying and not doing his job.
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 08, 2009, 09:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by yawetag View Post
To me, it's not the sex that's the issue. The issue is the appearance of favoritism, and it stems from fraternization, not sex.

For example, if a judge was caught dating or spending more time with a lawyer, questions will come out on whether he favored that lawyer in court proceedings. Whether they were in bed together doesn't matter much at all.
I also stated very plainly that her being caught doing it should result in her being dismissed. And I make that statement because a personal relationship between a player and an umpire shows impropriety. I even compared it to a judge having a relationship with a prosecutor.
Quote:
Originally Posted by yawetag View Post
Sanford's case was more about lying and not doing his job.
Sanford's case caused a dual uproar, and his abandoning his post for five days was one of them. I was referring to the business of his having a mistress and all of the lunacy and hypocrisy that it caused. It may not have been more important than his leaving his post, but it certainly was one of the prominent aspects, and the reaction to it was laughable.
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 08, 2009, 09:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty View Post
I also stated very plainly that her being caught doing it should result in her being dismissed. And I make that statement because a personal relationship between a player and an umpire shows impropriety. I even compared it to a judge having a relationship with a prosecutor.
Sanford's case caused a dual uproar, and his abandoning his post for five days was one of them. I was referring to the business of his having a mistress and all of the lunacy and hypocrisy that it caused. It may not have been more important than his leaving his post, but it certainly was one of the prominent aspects, and the reaction to it was laughable.
I want to know should the player also get in trouble for sleeping with the umpire? If she should get fired, what should happen to the player..
__________________
"My greatest fear is that when I die, my wife will sell my golf clubs for what I told her I paid for them."
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 08, 2009, 09:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty View Post
Sanford's case caused a dual uproar, and his abandoning his post for five days was one of them. I was referring to the business of his having a mistress and all of the lunacy and hypocrisy that it caused. It may not have been more important than his leaving his post, but it certainly was one of the prominent aspects, and the reaction to it was laughable.
His wife didn't think it was funny.
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 08, 2009, 09:41pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Umpmazza View Post
I want to know should the player also get in trouble for sleeping with the umpire? If she should get fired, what should happen to the player..
I think the player should be forced to sleep with Mark Sanford, Bill Clinton and David Letterman.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 08, 2009, 09:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
I meant its being blown up bigger than any other aspect and made a colossal spectacle was what was laughable. It's the personal lives of human beings that are being toyed with, including children's.

Last edited by Kevin Finnerty; Sun Nov 08, 2009 at 09:47pm.
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 08, 2009, 09:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SC
Posts: 12
Don't know and don't care what she did off the field. Bottom line, she was not a good umpire and was kept longer than many who didn't miss the things she did on the field.
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 09, 2009, 09:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
So what you're saying is she sucked two different ways.

That makes more sense.
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 09, 2009, 05:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SC
Posts: 12
Nope. I'm saying she wasn't AAA material. That's all.
Reply With Quote
  #71 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 09, 2009, 11:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,577
Five pages of sheesh!

Quote:
Originally Posted by turnit View Post
Nope. I'm saying she wasn't AAA material. That's all.
Great comment, ENuf said.
Any more doubters out there?
__________________
SAump
Reply With Quote
  #72 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 10, 2009, 10:16am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
Have there been doubters?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
top 10 female athletes bum783 Softball 2 Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:57am
New Correctable error casebook play 2.10.1 - NCAA treatment CallMeMrRef Basketball 7 Wed Feb 18, 2009 02:42pm
Female Officials coach41 Basketball 15 Mon Nov 06, 2006 09:08pm
Female Ref's brandan89 Basketball 14 Thu Jun 23, 2005 10:24pm
Deferring to parnter vs the rookie treatment bigzilla Basketball 84 Sat Feb 05, 2005 08:11pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:57pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1