The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Bud Black EJ (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/54273-bud-black-ej.html)

SanDiegoSteve Sat Aug 15, 2009 05:15pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by kylejt (Post 620643)
His calls are so slow, I'm still waiting for it two years later.

How true!:)

SethPDX Sat Aug 15, 2009 05:16pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 620646)
How true!:)

I was gonna say, I know a lot of Padre fans still waiting for Holladay to touch the plate. ;)

jwwashburn Sat Aug 15, 2009 07:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrUmpire (Post 620640)
No, you're missing my point, which is the umpire called what he "saw" as the correct call. MLB umpires do not intentionally make the wrong call any more than any of us do. He believed he got it right.

Oy vey.

I have been wrong many times over the years on tag plays.

I have missed hundreds of balls and strikes in my 15+ years.

I have never called a guy out for missing a base unless I SAW him miss it.

If you BELIEVE a guy missed a base, you call him safe.

If you are SEE him miss definitely miss the base, you call him out(assuming proper appeal).

This PU did not SEE this runner miss home plate, he BELIEVED it.

LDUB Sat Aug 15, 2009 07:58pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwwashburn (Post 620662)
This PU did not SEE this runner miss home plate, he BELIEVED it.

You still don't get it. He did see the runner miss the plate. It is possible to see something that didn't actually happen.

Back from 2003..

"'Procedurally, I didn't handle it 100 percent right,' McClelland told The Post in an exclusive interview in the umpires' room in The Stadium. "But I'm sure it hit the pole."

When asked if McClelland saw if the ball hit a fan's glove and not the foul pole, the veteran ump was adamant that he saw the ball hit the pole. Television replays showed that it hit a fan's glove and dropped on to the field."


He saw the ball hit the pole not a glove. Replays showed that it hit a glove. What he saw wasn't actually what happened.

jwwashburn Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:21pm

I am not surprised that you believe that someone can SEE something that did not happened.

johnnyg08 Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:31pm

is it "cognitive dissonance"? is that the term?

LDUB Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:44pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwwashburn (Post 620671)
I am not surprised that you believe that someone can SEE something that did not happened.

Well I am pretty smart.

Is that picture moving?

http://www.magictrance.net/images/wave.gif

Ump153 Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:47pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwwashburn (Post 620671)
I am not surprised that you believe that someone can SEE something that did not happened.

It happens all the time.

I've had coaches SEE tags that didn't take place. My personal favorite is a coach who SAW the ball hit the foul line when there was no foul line.

People see UFO's.

Cops see people with weapons who don't have so much as a nail file.

It happens.

BigTex Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:52pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ump153 (Post 620675)
It happens all the time.

I've had coaches SEE tags that didn't take place. My personal favorite is a coach who SAW the ball hit the foul line when there was no foul line.

People see UFO's.

Cops see people with weapons who don't have so much as a nail file.

It happens.

Depending on how it is used, a nail file can be a weapon. When I was on the job, I had an old lady try to stab me in the chest with a knitting needle (thank goodness for my vest).

Ump153 Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:30pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigTex (Post 620676)
Depending on how it is used, a nail file can be a weapon.

Reading is a skill, officer.

I referred to poeple who DID NOT have a nail file.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1